Autodesk Simulation CFD
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Advection schemes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
I pick this thread from one of my recent experiences. Typically, first order advection schemes (ADV1) and second order accurate advection schemes (ADV5) would produce different results because of artificial viscosity in ADV1. But would these results be very much affected ONLY while simulating distributed resistance, which models a negative pressure gradient zone? Or do these schemes always produce significantly different results for ALL types of physics, viz. incompressible turbulent flow, heat transfer, compressible flow etc.?
Regards
OJ
Re: Advection schemes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Anyone, please?
Regards
OJ
Re: Advection schemes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Someone?
Re: Advection schemes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
We would recommend switching away from ADV1 and to ADV5 for many purposes now. Standard incompressible flow should be OK but ADV5 will be better for compressible and pressure driven flows, those with resistances as you rightly say and also for many heat transfer calculations now too.

Jon Wilde
Product Support Specialist
Autodesk, Inc.
