• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis

    Reply
    Valued Mentor
    AJA14
    Posts: 334
    Registered: ‎11-01-2011

    cable design

    486 Views, 1 Replies
    11-14-2011 12:37 AM

    In analysis of cables via robot, a pretension value has to be inserted and then iterations have to be made. I was wondering if there was a way to predetermine a good judgement for the pretension to be used for the cable which eliminates the need for doing many iterations. This may not be a pure robot question but I would appreciate the help nevertheless.

    Ali Al-Hammoud
    Structural Design Engineer
    MZ & Partners Engineering Consultancy
    Please use plain text.
    Product Support
    Posts: 345
    Registered: ‎06-23-2008

    Re: cable design

    11-15-2011 12:38 AM in reply to: AJA14

    For preliminary analysis of models containing many cables it is much more efficient to define cables not by pretension but by elongation or length:

    cable.PNG

    In such case when specifying for instance zero relative elengation the unloaded cable length equal to the distance of end nodes will be used. For instance +0.01 relative elongation corresponds to unloaded cable length 1 percent longer than the distance of end nodes.

    In case of defining cables by pre-tension it is sometimes very difficult to predict what unloaded cable lengths may be necessary to obtain it and moreover there is a risk that equilibrium and convergence is not possible with reasonable lengths of cables. See:

    http://docs.autodesk.com/RSA/2012/ENU/filesROBOT/GUID-DCDD6D6E-D1BA-4535-9A21-AA28C9277CF-243.htm 

     

    If this post answer your question please click "Accept as Solution". It will help everyone to find answer more quickly!

     

    Best regards,



    Pawel Pulak
    Support Specialist
    Product Support
    Autodesk, Inc.

    Please use plain text.