Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
RSA API vs .STR : slower or faster ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I am working on a cable net structure. I have in my model 529 nodes and 1016 bars. Each bar is a cable element and has a specific cable definition (section and relative dilatation), so I have 1016 different cable sections.
If i use API code to build the RSA model (nodes, elements, sections, supports, prestress load), it is very very long (290 sec. !!). The part which seems to be very long is the cable section definition. It is weird, because if I save the project as a .rtd file, close RSA, and then re-open the .rtd file, the opening is much faster.
I tried to create a temporary .str file to do the same, and then import it and delete the file when importation is completed. For the same result, the calculation time falls to 16 sec, which is 20 times faster ! But still too slow. And I would like to avoid using the str format, as it is not improved anymore, and as syntax is different from API.
So my question is : is there a way to accelerate my code using only API (set RSA not visible for example), or do I have to keep using a .str temporary file ? And how can I speed my code if I work with the .str file ?
Thanks for your help.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Re: RSA API vs .STR : slower or faster ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
have you tried dll?
Do you use cache?

Rafal Gaweda
Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.
Re: RSA API vs .STR : slower or faster ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I tried to use cache, as follow :
Dim cache As RobotStructureCache
cache = Robot.Project.Structure.CreateCache()
(...)section definition for Toile1, Toile2, ...
For i = 0 To tabElts.GetLength(0) - 1
cache.SetBarLabel(i + 1, IRobotLabelType.I_LT_BAR_CABLE, "Toile " & i + 1)
Next
Robot.Project.Structure.ApplyCache(cache)
No error message, but it does not work. What's wrong ?
Re: RSA API vs .STR : slower or faster ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sorry, unfortunately applying cable lables by cache does not work so far.

Rafal Gaweda
Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.
Re: RSA API vs .STR : slower or faster ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
OK, that is too bad...
But is my cript correct for another type of bar ?
And will the .str format be still supported by RSA in the future ?
Re: RSA API vs .STR : slower or faster ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
guillaumeniel wrote:
OK, that is too bad...
But is my cript correct for another type of bar ?
Seems ok.
Example code:
Dim robot_cache As RobotStructureCache robot_cache = robot.Project.Structure.createcache For i As int32 = 0 To examplenumber robot_cache.AddNode(nodenum, X, Y, Z) robot_cache.AddNode(nodenum+1, X1, Y1, Z1) robot_cache.AddBar(barnum, nodenum, nodenum + 1, "", "", 0) 'Generate bar in cache robot_cache.SetBarLabel(barnum, IRobotLabelType. I_LT_BAR_SECTION, "HEA100") Next 'Create the Robot objects from the cache robot.Project.Structure.ApplyCache(robot_cache)
And will the .str format be still supported by RSA in the future ?
It is \ will be preserved in the state as is now.

Rafal Gaweda
Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.
Re: RSA API vs .STR : slower or faster ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
OK, Thanks
Re: RSA API vs .STR : slower or faster ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
cache for cables corrected for this syntax:
rc.AddBar barnumber, node1, node2, "Cable_1", "STEEL"
in SP4 for Robot 2013

Rafal Gaweda
Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.
