• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • Discussion Groups

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis

    Reply
    Valued Contributor
    pevelor
    Posts: 87
    Registered: ‎12-12-2011
    Accepted Solution

    One-way slab transeverse reinfocement

    330 Views, 2 Replies
    12-16-2011 01:25 AM

    Hi guys

     

    I am designing according to EC2, which gives the following rule:

    The transvarse (secondary) reinforcement in a one-way slab should be at least 20% of the main reinforcement.

    Also, at supports where there  is no chance of transverse moment there is no need for transverse reinforcement.

    Ref. EC2, part 1-1, point 9.3.1.1

     

    When I perform calculation of required reinforcement for my one-way slab I don't get result which complies with this criterion.

    What kind of actions do I have to perform in order to fix this?

     

    In beforehand, thanks for all help

     

    Regards

    Peder

    Please use plain text.
    Product Support
    Artur.Kosakowski
    Posts: 2,773
    Registered: ‎12-17-2010

    Re: One-way slab transeverse reinfocement

    12-16-2011 01:54 AM in reply to: pevelor

    Peder,

     

    The current approach in Robot is that if you decide on the unidirectional reinforcement the calculations of reinforcement for the secondary one are not done. We will consider your post as the request for the new feature development for the next versions of Robot. For now you can try to add the disclaimer under the results for the main direction that informs that the secondary reinforcement is 20% of the main one or try to calculate the reinforcement having the unidirectional reinforcement switched off.

     

     



    Artur Kosakowski
    Support Specialist
    Product Support
    Autodesk, Inc.

    Please use plain text.
    Valued Contributor
    pevelor
    Posts: 87
    Registered: ‎12-12-2011

    Re: One-way slab transeverse reinfocement

    12-16-2011 02:12 AM in reply to: Artur.Kosakowski

    Thanks Arthur for your quick and good response.

    Please use plain text.