Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Copying items in RC navigator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear Sirs;
Could you tell me how can I copy defined (item is listed in a navigator) foundation item from one node to others?
Controls with node numbers are block in navigator - why cannot we add node numbers in a simply way instaed of define new item from begining ?
After clicking on any item (right mouse button menu) we can see "Move selection from/on structure" - how do these options work because I didn't notice any results, there is also no help in a program documentation ?
We have also simple "Edit/Copy, Paste" options - but result is a copy of selected item with empty property cells.
Maybe I do something wrong - please explain how should I do that in a proper way , because I see no sense in that all.
Thanks in advance for any help !
BR.
Re: Copying items in RC navigator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
If you want to copy reinforcement between elements - you can do it by saving opening rxd file for typical elements.
Otherwise I suggest to use grouping of elements while importing to RC module.

Rafal Gaweda
Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.
Re: Copying items in RC navigator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear Rafał;
Thanks for your hints - it is a partial solution of course.
Let me explain more precisely - I don't want to copy reinforcement which is a result of design and can be easily calculated in seconds.
I wanted to copy a "type of foundation" with its full definition like geometry, soil conditions etc. from one node to the others like a template - not to fill all data from the beginning.
What do you mean by "grouping" objects in Robot?
I selected several nodes (..is it "grouping" meant by you ?) and tranfered them into RC-foundation module, they are shown in a list and its contents cannot be changed manually.
Don't you think it would be better for us to have a possibility to change a list of nodes?
Is there any way to edit it in a present version of Robot (maybe we don't know about some options which can be unlocked) ?
If not - please find it as a polite request to your programmers ![]()
BTW. When we select exactly two nodes - program asks if we want to define footing under two columns (it was described in the manual). If a number of selected nodes is greater - there is no question displayed
BR
Re: Copying items in RC navigator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Let me explain more precisely - I don't want to copy reinforcement which is a result of design and can be easily calculated in seconds.
I wanted to copy a "type of foundation" with its full definition like geometry, soil conditions etc. from one node to the others like a template - not to fill all data from the beginning.
Geometry and some bars settings can be transfered by rxd file :
Calculation options:
Reinf pattern:
Soil :
What do you mean by "grouping" objects in Robot?
And design will be performed as for one foundation for envelope of forces from selected (grouped) nodes.

Rafal Gaweda
Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.
Re: Copying items in RC navigator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
OK - I tested "grouping"
My remarks:
- "According to geometry" works if columns cross-sections are the same - in order to get what I wanted I had to cheat Robot and changed cross-sections for all columns to one common. After Robot had created one foundation for those nodes I changed cross-sections to "original".
-"According to story" groups elements because of elevation of node/column/beam etc.
Both options are useful but the most necessary is "user defined" grouping
Dear programmers - allow us to define types of foundations for "user defined" set of nodes !
It will be a simple option that will bring more benefit than those built-in "smart" options - which do not work as if I wished (hope others too .... judging from the read posts eg. steel connections).
Please do not treat my words as a criticism - in our common bussiness is to improve this programme (that's why this forum exists I think...) and the most valuable are the remarks of engineers with any design practise.
