• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • Discussion Groups

    Autodesk Revit MEP Wishes

    Reply
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 175
    Registered: ‎08-11-2008

    Electrical Conduit

    358 Views, 17 Replies
    03-10-2009 08:12 AM
    We need electrical conduit in the worst sort of way. Plumbing has their pipes and mechanical has their duct, but if we are going to truly start modeling our systems in a truly BIM environment, we need the same sort of conduit that you would find in AutoCAD MEP.
    Please use plain text.
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 540
    Registered: ‎09-16-2005

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    04-21-2009 12:12 PM in reply to: RedMan77
    Vote 2 of year 2009... I hope this gets into the priority items this time around! (Crossing my fingers)
    Please use plain text.
    *BIM is in

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    04-22-2009 04:18 AM in reply to: RedMan77

    Conduit is easy! Just create your conduit type as
    you would pipe types. Then create a workset called Electrical piping and make it
    curent when you draw. Draw your conduit in that workset and then turn the work
    set off in the other views. Thats what we do for all out piping needs such
    as electrical, med gas, etc. Make a workset for each.


    style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    Vote
    2 of year 2009... I hope this gets into the priority items this time around!
    (Crossing my fingers)
    Please use plain text.
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 186
    Registered: ‎10-06-2008

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    05-05-2009 11:07 AM in reply to: RedMan77
    But that is not the proper way to do it, the proper way is to have an actual conduit tool. I still say real conduit tools are a must.
    Please use plain text.
    New Member
    Posts: 2
    Registered: ‎05-14-2009

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    05-14-2009 06:35 AM in reply to: RedMan77
    I agree we need electrical conduit. Using the pipe for plumbing is all well and good but the fittings are all different.
    Please use plain text.
    Valued Mentor
    dennis
    Posts: 523
    Registered: ‎07-29-2005

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    05-19-2009 11:26 AM in reply to: RedMan77
    Another "gotcha" with your scenario is that if the file is linked, the Hosting file cannot make use of the Workset designations in the Linked file. (Unless I have missed something somewhere)
    Please use plain text.
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 161
    Registered: ‎04-06-2009

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    06-13-2009 09:43 PM in reply to: RedMan77
    Yes - Conduit, we need it.

    But it won't be there till at least the next release

    So in the meantime - Pipes.

    Worksets for visability control though isn't great as you can't control worksets in view templates. The alternative is to add a parameter to the project for 'Pipe Use' - which you can then filter through
    Please use plain text.
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 540
    Registered: ‎09-16-2005

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    07-13-2009 10:32 AM in reply to: RedMan77
    Conduit and wiring, NOT piping. Conduit and wiring. Other people use duct for faking in conduit also.
    Please use plain text.
    Valued Mentor
    dennis
    Posts: 523
    Registered: ‎07-29-2005

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    07-20-2009 10:00 AM in reply to: RedMan77
    Use a FILTER called CONDUIT who search for components with the name CONDUIT in them. So you will create a PIPE TYPE called Conduit, and duplicate the elbows, tees, etc and rename them with Conduit, ie Conduit Elbow, Conduit Tee, and on and on. Then you can create a Filter that will look for Pipe Type that has the word Conduit in it.

    Works great, even tho it is a workaround. A true conduit object type would be better.
    Please use plain text.
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 540
    Registered: ‎09-16-2005

    Re: Electrical Conduit

    07-20-2009 10:13 AM in reply to: RedMan77
    A true conduit object type would be better.

    Absolutely!
    Please use plain text.