Autodesk MapGuide Developer
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Quality of Maps with Onsite
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
15 Views, 2 Replies
06-26-2002 07:04 PM
We're generating maps for Onsite using Onsite Enterprise.
Even if the quality of the source map is good and the couple Mapguide/Liteview display maps in a perfect way, the same maps on Onsite looks really not so good.
1. The labels of the roads are alway too big when you zoom in
2. The street thickness is lost on Onsite
3. It is sometime very difficult to select an object on a map.
I can send some sample OSD that confirms the point stated before.
Why there is this big difference in terms of quality of output using Onsite Enterprise 2? Are there any plan to better the software? What kind of authoring is required?
Let me know,
Massimo Cristaldi, dr.
Technical Director
Mestor - http://www.mestor.com
Even if the quality of the source map is good and the couple Mapguide/Liteview display maps in a perfect way, the same maps on Onsite looks really not so good.
1. The labels of the roads are alway too big when you zoom in
2. The street thickness is lost on Onsite
3. It is sometime very difficult to select an object on a map.
I can send some sample OSD that confirms the point stated before.
Why there is this big difference in terms of quality of output using Onsite Enterprise 2? Are there any plan to better the software? What kind of authoring is required?
Let me know,
Massimo Cristaldi, dr.
Technical Director
Mestor - http://www.mestor.com
*Rylander, Joakim
Re: Quality of Maps with Onsite
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-26-2002 07:43 PM in reply to:
mcristaldi
Good questions, wish I could help
you...
you...
Autodesk? Any response? Onsite 3.0?
Best regards,
Jocke
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"mcristaldi" <We're
href="mailto:cristaldi@mestor.com">cristaldi@mestor.com> wrote in
message
href="news:f0efcca.-1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f0efcca.-1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
generating maps for Onsite using Onsite Enterprise.
Even if the quality of
the source map is good and the couple Mapguide/Liteview display maps in a
perfect way, the same maps on Onsite looks really not so good.
1. The labels of the roads are alway too big when you zoom in
2. The
street thickness is lost on Onsite
3. It is sometime very difficult to
select an object on a map.
I can send some sample OSD that confirms the point stated before.
Why there is this big difference in terms of quality of output using Onsite
Enterprise 2? Are there any plan to better the software? What kind of
authoring is required?
Let me know,
Massimo Cristaldi, dr.
Technical Director
Mestor -
href="http://www.mestor.com">http://www.mestor.com
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-03-2002 06:48 PM in reply to:
mcristaldi
The problem is really hard and seems to be a bug. I've received some direct email concerning this issue from other developers all around.
We've raised a case with Autodesk (Rif. 797690) and we're waiting for some response.
Kind Regards,
Massimo Cristaldi - Technical Director
MESTOR - http://www.mestor.com
We've raised a case with Autodesk (Rif. 797690) and we're waiting for some response.
Kind Regards,
Massimo Cristaldi - Technical Director
MESTOR - http://www.mestor.com
