Autodesk Inventor
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Wave Washers
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
377 Views, 4 Replies
01-25-2010 08:46 AM
Hello, has anyone modeled up a wave washer in Inventor?? If so, what method did you use?
thanks,
Greg Reeder
thanks,
Greg Reeder
Re: Wave Washers
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-25-2010 08:51 AM in reply to:
papa_whealie
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Inventor+wave+washer
A search turned up something at sDotson (http://www.mcadforums.com),
you might also check clbiss.com
and I have seen this covered in the Skillbuilders and several times here in the forum.
A search turned up something at sDotson (http://www.mcadforums.com),
you might also check clbiss.com
and I have seen this covered in the Skillbuilders and several times here in the forum.
Please mark this response as "Accept as Solution" if it answers your question.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autodesk Inventor 2013 Certified Professional
Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 Certified Professional
Certified SolidWorks Professional
Inventor Professional 2013 SP 1.1 Edu 64-bit
GeForce GTX 560M i7-2670QM @ 2.2GHz 8GB RAM
http://home.pct.edu/~jmather/content/DSG322/inventor_surface_tutorials.htm
http://www.autodesk.com/edcommunity
Still waiting for -Draft option on any Rib feature.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autodesk Inventor 2013 Certified Professional
Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 Certified Professional
Certified SolidWorks Professional
Inventor Professional 2013 SP 1.1 Edu 64-bit
GeForce GTX 560M i7-2670QM @ 2.2GHz 8GB RAM
http://home.pct.edu/~jmather/content/DSG322/inventor_surface_tutorials.htm
http://www.autodesk.com/edcommunity
Still waiting for -Draft option on any Rib feature.
*Walt Jaquith
Re: Wave Washers
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-25-2010 09:22 AM in reply to:
papa_whealie
Cory's solution is very elegant. Here's a quick and dirty attempt. It
results in some unnecessary geometry; a small gap in the washer since the
emboss command won't close. With a bit of tweaking there's probably a way
to make this one cleaner, but I haven't got the time to play with it this
morning.
Cheers,
Walt
results in some unnecessary geometry; a small gap in the washer since the
emboss command won't close. With a bit of tweaking there's probably a way
to make this one cleaner, but I haven't got the time to play with it this
morning.
Cheers,
Walt
*Ray Dyson
Re: Wave Washers
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-25-2010 03:29 PM in reply to:
papa_whealie
Walt,
Two suggestion:
Instead of 3.1415****** use "PI" (without quotes), easier and supposedly
more accurate.
Emboss only half the wave form, then mirror. No need to subtract the
.0001mm. No gap.
Ray
"Walt Jaquith" wrote in message
news:6323995@discussion.autodesk.com...
Cory's solution is very elegant. Here's a quick and dirty attempt. It
results in some unnecessary geometry; a small gap in the washer since the
emboss command won't close. With a bit of tweaking there's probably a way
to make this one cleaner, but I haven't got the time to play with it this
morning.
Cheers,
Walt
Two suggestion:
Instead of 3.1415****** use "PI" (without quotes), easier and supposedly
more accurate.
Emboss only half the wave form, then mirror. No need to subtract the
.0001mm. No gap.
Ray
"Walt Jaquith"
news:6323995@discussion.autodesk.com...
Cory's solution is very elegant. Here's a quick and dirty attempt. It
results in some unnecessary geometry; a small gap in the washer since the
emboss command won't close. With a bit of tweaking there's probably a way
to make this one cleaner, but I haven't got the time to play with it this
morning.
Cheers,
Walt
*Walt Jaquith
Re: Wave Washers
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-25-2010 04:06 PM in reply to:
papa_whealie
Nice. Thanks Ray; I knew there'd be someone in here who could puzzle it
out. It left a couple tangent lines at the mirror point when I did it, but
that's a much cleaner model.
Here's another approach off the top of my head. This one I did in thirds
instead of quadrants, to see how it would work. I had to kind of trick the
loft command to give me tangent condition curves, but once I did, the
default weight returned very close to a circle. Like the other one, There's
probably a lot of room for improvement on the technique; this was just a few
minute's diversion.
Cheers,
Walt
"Ray Dyson" wrote in message
news:6324318@discussion.autodesk.com...
Walt,
Two suggestion:
Instead of 3.1415****** use "PI" (without quotes), easier and supposedly
more accurate.
Emboss only half the wave form, then mirror. No need to subtract the
.0001mm. No gap.
Ray
"Walt Jaquith" wrote in message
news:6323995@discussion.autodesk.com...
Cory's solution is very elegant. Here's a quick and dirty attempt. It
results in some unnecessary geometry; a small gap in the washer since the
emboss command won't close. With a bit of tweaking there's probably a way
to make this one cleaner, but I haven't got the time to play with it this
morning.
Cheers,
Walt
out. It left a couple tangent lines at the mirror point when I did it, but
that's a much cleaner model.
Here's another approach off the top of my head. This one I did in thirds
instead of quadrants, to see how it would work. I had to kind of trick the
loft command to give me tangent condition curves, but once I did, the
default weight returned very close to a circle. Like the other one, There's
probably a lot of room for improvement on the technique; this was just a few
minute's diversion.
Cheers,
Walt
"Ray Dyson"
news:6324318@discussion.autodesk.com...
Walt,
Two suggestion:
Instead of 3.1415****** use "PI" (without quotes), easier and supposedly
more accurate.
Emboss only half the wave form, then mirror. No need to subtract the
.0001mm. No gap.
Ray
"Walt Jaquith"
news:6323995@discussion.autodesk.com...
Cory's solution is very elegant. Here's a quick and dirty attempt. It
results in some unnecessary geometry; a small gap in the washer since the
emboss command won't close. With a bit of tweaking there's probably a way
to make this one cleaner, but I haven't got the time to play with it this
morning.
Cheers,
Walt
