• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • Autodesk Inventor

    Reply
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 821
    Registered: ‎12-11-2003

    Update Parts List

    52 Views, 6 Replies
    11-07-2002 08:59 PM
    Apparently out of date Parts List in the IDW can now be updated (instead of deleted and reinserted) and indicate this by turning red, why don't they just update or at least why don't we have the option to have them update automatically. (If they do and I've mist it just ignore me)
    Regards
    Matt Hutchinson
    Please use plain text.
    *Dotson, Sean

    Re: Update Parts List

    11-07-2002 09:13 PM in reply to: MattH
    There was a discussion on this a few weeks
    ago.  While many wanted them to update automatically the point was brought
    up about data you had typed in manually.  You can RMB on this data and
    choose Freeze to preserve it but if you had not chosen to freeze the data it
    would be lost.  I guess it was the lesser of two evils.  If ADSK did
    it automatically then people would complain about that.  This way it's up
    tot he user.  I think a few people suggested making this a toggle switch
    between auto and manual.


    --
    Sean Dotson, PE

    href="http://www.sdotson.com">http://www.sdotson.com

    ...sleep is for the
    weak..
    -----------------------------------------


    style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    Apparently
    out of date Parts List in the IDW can now be updated (instead of deleted and
    reinserted) and indicate this by turning red, why don't they just update or at
    least why don't we have the option to have them update automatically. (If they
    do and I've mist it just ignore me)
    Regards
    Matt
    Hutchinson
    Please use plain text.
    *McConnell, Cory

    Re:

    11-07-2002 10:07 PM in reply to: MattH
    I think it is very functional the way it is. Just rmb on the red plist icon
    and pick update.

    When you say you couldn't update in 5.3? Clicking compare and update all
    wouldn't work?

    --
    Cory McConnell
    BJ pipeline Inspection
    "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
    news:7C69A533ADF1446B3A07D2499B728FDA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > There was a discussion on this a few weeks ago. While many wanted them to
    update automatically the point was brought up about data you had typed in
    manually. You can RMB on this data and choose Freeze to preserve it but if
    you had not chosen to freeze the data it would be lost. I guess it was the
    lesser of two evils. If ADSK did it automatically then people would
    complain about that. This way it's up tot he user. I think a few people
    suggested making this a toggle switch between auto and manual.
    >
    > --
    > Sean Dotson, PE
    > http://www.sdotson.com
    > ...sleep is for the weak..
    > -----------------------------------------
    > "MattH" wrote in message
    news:f1214c2.-1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Apparently out of date Parts List in the IDW can now be updated (instead
    of deleted and reinserted) and indicate this by turning red, why don't they
    just update or at least why don't we have the option to have them update
    automatically. (If they do and I've mist it just ignore me)
    > Regards
    > Matt Hutchinson
    >
    Please use plain text.
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 387
    Registered: ‎12-10-2003

    Re: Update Parts List

    11-07-2002 10:53 PM in reply to: MattH
    I don't understand why you had to reinsert the parts list just do a compare.
    Please use plain text.
    *Keller, Kent

    Re:

    11-08-2002 12:29 AM in reply to: MattH
    Sean

    I don't remember anyone complaining in MDT that their Bom data updated on a parametric cad
    program. Isn't that what Parametric is for? This one just makes no sense to me and is
    nothing but bad drawings waiting to happen. If people are having to override the data so
    much then the reasons for that need to be looked at closer.

    --
    Kent
    Member of the Autodesk Discussion Forum Moderator Program


    "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
    news:7C69A533ADF1446B3A07D2499B728FDA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > There was a discussion on this a few weeks ago. While many wanted them to update
    automatically the point was brought up about data you had typed in manually. You can RMB
    on this data and choose Freeze to preserve it but if you had not chosen to freeze the data
    it would be lost. I guess it was the lesser of two evils. If ADSK did it automatically
    then people would complain about that. This way it's up tot he user. I think a few
    people suggested making this a toggle switch between auto and manual.
    Please use plain text.
    *Case, Mark

    Re:

    11-08-2002 03:33 AM in reply to: MattH
    Kent,

    Maybe they override it because having to right
    click|properties|Project(tab)|Enter "Desciption" on every stinkin' part gets
    mind numbing? :smileywink:

    It looks like you can still see the part "Description" information in IV6
    design assisant, in a nice tabular format...
    BUT YOU CAN'T ENTER IT THERE.

    Darn!

    --
    Mark Case, P.E.
    Sr. Mechanical Engineer
    CaseCAD Engineering
    (509) 773-7305
    web: http://w3.gorge.net/casecad

    "Kent Keller" wrote in message
    news:smileyvery-happy:D75D932E35345F44197B88FB4E0592D@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Sean
    >
    > I don't remember anyone complaining in MDT that their Bom data updated on
    a parametric cad
    > program. Isn't that what Parametric is for? This one just makes no sense
    to me and is
    > nothing but bad drawings waiting to happen. If people are having to
    override the data so
    > much then the reasons for that need to be looked at closer.
    >
    > --
    > Kent
    > Member of the Autodesk Discussion Forum Moderator Program
    >
    >
    > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
    > news:7C69A533ADF1446B3A07D2499B728FDA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > There was a discussion on this a few weeks ago. While many wanted them
    to update
    > automatically the point was brought up about data you had typed in
    manually. You can RMB
    > on this data and choose Freeze to preserve it but if you had not chosen to
    freeze the data
    > it would be lost. I guess it was the lesser of two evils. If ADSK did it
    automatically
    > then people would complain about that. This way it's up tot he user. I
    think a few
    > people suggested making this a toggle switch between auto and manual.
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Dotson, Sean

    Re:

    11-08-2002 05:18 AM in reply to: MattH
    Kent in a perfect world I would 100% agree with you. But you know as well
    as I do that sometimes workaround are required to get the job out of the
    engineers hands and into the manufacturing/assembly world. All I'm saying
    is if they were to go fully automatic that would be a shame. I'd prefer a
    switch to turn it on or off (kind of like defer updates)

    --
    Sean Dotson, PE
    http://www.sdotson.com
    ...sleep is for the weak..
    -----------------------------------------
    "Kent Keller" wrote in message
    news:smileyvery-happy:D75D932E35345F44197B88FB4E0592D@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Sean
    >
    > I don't remember anyone complaining in MDT that their Bom data updated on
    a parametric cad
    > program. Isn't that what Parametric is for? This one just makes no sense
    to me and is
    > nothing but bad drawings waiting to happen. If people are having to
    override the data so
    > much then the reasons for that need to be looked at closer.
    >
    > --
    > Kent
    > Member of the Autodesk Discussion Forum Moderator Program
    >
    >
    > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
    > news:7C69A533ADF1446B3A07D2499B728FDA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > There was a discussion on this a few weeks ago. While many wanted them
    to update
    > automatically the point was brought up about data you had typed in
    manually. You can RMB
    > on this data and choose Freeze to preserve it but if you had not chosen to
    freeze the data
    > it would be lost. I guess it was the lesser of two evils. If ADSK did it
    automatically
    > then people would complain about that. This way it's up tot he user. I
    think a few
    > people suggested making this a toggle switch between auto and manual.
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.