Autodesk Inventor
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
*Strenk, Jim
Unable to import Inventor 6 (SP1) SAT file into AutoCAD 2002
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
69 Views, 5 Replies
11-22-2002 12:47 PM
Inventor 5.3 SAT files can be brought into AutoCAD 2002 drawings, but not
Inventor R6 or SP1 SAT files. AutoCAD complains about either file version
or file type.
Is there a workaround, or must this issue be addressed with a Service Pack
or R7?
Inventor R6 or SP1 SAT files. AutoCAD complains about either file version
or file type.
Is there a workaround, or must this issue be addressed with a Service Pack
or R7?
*darvinv
Re: Unable to import Inventor 6 (SP1) SAT file into AutoCAD 2002
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2002 12:57 PM in reply to:
*Strenk, Jim
In "save copy as" dialog, click on options, turnversion down
to 6.
darvin
to 6.
darvin
*Zander, Quinn
Re: Unable to import Inventor 6 (SP1) SAT file into AutoCAD 2002
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2002 01:01 PM in reply to:
*Strenk, Jim
Jim,
Once you specify the filename, hit the options button in the save dialog
and bump the SAT version down to 6.0.
QBZ
"Jim Strenk" wrote in message
news:97085A43CCDA4DA9633F9A25577A4728@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> Inventor 5.3 SAT files can be brought into AutoCAD 2002 drawings, but
not
> Inventor R6 or SP1 SAT files. AutoCAD complains about either file
version
> or file type.
>
> Is there a workaround, or must this issue be addressed with a Service
Pack
> or R7?
>
>
Once you specify the filename, hit the options button in the save dialog
and bump the SAT version down to 6.0.
QBZ
"Jim Strenk"
news:97085A43CCDA4DA9633F9A25577A4728@in.WebX.maYI
> Inventor 5.3 SAT files can be brought into AutoCAD 2002 drawings, but
not
> Inventor R6 or SP1 SAT files. AutoCAD complains about either file
version
> or file type.
>
> Is there a workaround, or must this issue be addressed with a Service
Pack
> or R7?
>
>
*Strenk, Jim
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2002 06:59 PM in reply to:
*Strenk, Jim
By "turning it down a notch" aka a reverse Emeril Lagasse, did the trick. I
would imagine that future versions of AutoCAD will incorporate a newer
version of the ACIS Kernel, no?
Thanks Quinn and Darvinv for your replies!
"Quinn Zander" wrote in message
news:A4FAE1685B26FBFD5A4CE8389E384CED@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> Jim,
>
> Once you specify the filename, hit the options button in the save dialog
> and bump the SAT version down to 6.0.
>
> QBZ
>
would imagine that future versions of AutoCAD will incorporate a newer
version of the ACIS Kernel, no?
Thanks Quinn and Darvinv for your replies!
"Quinn Zander"
news:A4FAE1685B26FBFD5A4CE8389E384CED@in.WebX.maYI
> Jim,
>
> Once you specify the filename, hit the options button in the save dialog
> and bump the SAT version down to 6.0.
>
> QBZ
>
*Fulford, Drew
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2002 01:18 AM in reply to:
*Strenk, Jim
I would guess new acads will read SAT 7 since they are built on new ASM
kernel which was founded on ACIS 7. But beyond 7 it wont be called ACIS
(SAT) as adesks licencing of acis stopped at R7. I have no idea if there
will be a new exchange format developed for ASM as it moves forward. Imagine
if autodesk set a standard for fully featured exchange.
- drew
--
Drew Fulford B.A.Sc. Systems Engineer
Solid Caddgroup Inc. Burlington, Ontario
Tel: (905)331-9670, Fax: (905)331-7280
Corporate: http://www.solidcadcam.com/
Member of the Autodesk Discussion Forum Moderator Program
Visit my MCAD website @ http://www.mymcad.com/
"Jim Strenk" wrote in message
news:CF3C4E97A5B4514FB9BCBCCA4E47D96C@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> By "turning it down a notch" aka a reverse Emeril Lagasse, did the trick.
I
> would imagine that future versions of AutoCAD will incorporate a newer
> version of the ACIS Kernel, no?
>
> Thanks Quinn and Darvinv for your replies!
>
> "Quinn Zander" wrote in message
> news:A4FAE1685B26FBFD5A4CE8389E384CED@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> > Jim,
> >
> > Once you specify the filename, hit the options button in the save dialog
> > and bump the SAT version down to 6.0.
> >
> > QBZ
> >
>
>
kernel which was founded on ACIS 7. But beyond 7 it wont be called ACIS
(SAT) as adesks licencing of acis stopped at R7. I have no idea if there
will be a new exchange format developed for ASM as it moves forward. Imagine
if autodesk set a standard for fully featured exchange.
- drew
--
Drew Fulford B.A.Sc. Systems Engineer
Solid Caddgroup Inc. Burlington, Ontario
Tel: (905)331-9670, Fax: (905)331-7280
Corporate: http://www.solidcadcam.com/
Member of the Autodesk Discussion Forum Moderator Program
Visit my MCAD website @ http://www.mymcad.com/
"Jim Strenk"
news:CF3C4E97A5B4514FB9BCBCCA4E47D96C@in.WebX.maYI
> By "turning it down a notch" aka a reverse Emeril Lagasse, did the trick.
I
> would imagine that future versions of AutoCAD will incorporate a newer
> version of the ACIS Kernel, no?
>
> Thanks Quinn and Darvinv for your replies!
>
> "Quinn Zander"
> news:A4FAE1685B26FBFD5A4CE8389E384CED@in.WebX.maYI
> > Jim,
> >
> > Once you specify the filename, hit the options button in the save dialog
> > and bump the SAT version down to 6.0.
> >
> > QBZ
> >
>
>
*darvinv
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2002 02:34 AM in reply to:
*Strenk, Jim
drew,
Isn't that where Open Step and Open CNC are supposed to
be taking us? What would be wrong with co-operating with
those efforts?
darvin
Isn't that where Open Step and Open CNC are supposed to
be taking us? What would be wrong with co-operating with
those efforts?
darvin

