Autodesk Inventor
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
*Cook, Gary
Renaming files using DA vs ren command
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
45 Views, 2 Replies
11-05-2002 10:17 AM
Fumbling along trying to use DA to rename a bunch of files, and wondering if
I'm missing something. Basically, I used pack'n'go to copy a project with
all the files beginning with the prefix 217 to a new folder.
I wanted to use DA to rename the many files to use a 272 prefix, but found
it very tedious. Instead, I used the Win2K CMD shell and used the ren
commnad "ren 217*.* 272*.*"
Presto. You have to nurse the assembly upon first opening, but it seems
light years faster than using DA. But, like I said, perhaps I'm missing
something. Any feedback from more enlightened users?
Thanks.
I'm missing something. Basically, I used pack'n'go to copy a project with
all the files beginning with the prefix 217 to a new folder.
I wanted to use DA to rename the many files to use a 272 prefix, but found
it very tedious. Instead, I used the Win2K CMD shell and used the ren
commnad "ren 217*.* 272*.*"
Presto. You have to nurse the assembly upon first opening, but it seems
light years faster than using DA. But, like I said, perhaps I'm missing
something. Any feedback from more enlightened users?
Thanks.
*Dotson, Sean
Re: Renaming files using DA vs ren command
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-05-2002 10:55 AM in reply to:
*Cook, Gary
In this situation I'd do what you did. However for complex project
structures (especially in a shared environment) things aren't always so
simple.
--
Sean Dotson
Inventor Tutorials and More
http://www.sdotson.com
remove all #s from email to send
"Gary Cook" <1gcook2@3comautotech4.com (remove #s)> wrote in message
news:5754690BCEB0A2B62679F399D3CB4612@in.WebX.maYI adrTaRb...
> Fumbling along trying to use DA to rename a bunch of files, and wondering
if
> I'm missing something. Basically, I used pack'n'go to copy a project with
> all the files beginning with the prefix 217 to a new folder.
>
> I wanted to use DA to rename the many files to use a 272 prefix, but found
> it very tedious. Instead, I used the Win2K CMD shell and used the ren
> commnad "ren 217*.* 272*.*"
>
> Presto. You have to nurse the assembly upon first opening, but it seems
> light years faster than using DA. But, like I said, perhaps I'm missing
> something. Any feedback from more enlightened users?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
structures (especially in a shared environment) things aren't always so
simple.
--
Sean Dotson
Inventor Tutorials and More
http://www.sdotson.com
remove all #s from email to send
"Gary Cook" <1gcook2@3comautotech4.com (remove #s)> wrote in message
news:5754690BCEB0A2B62679F399D3CB4612@in.WebX.maYI
> Fumbling along trying to use DA to rename a bunch of files, and wondering
if
> I'm missing something. Basically, I used pack'n'go to copy a project with
> all the files beginning with the prefix 217 to a new folder.
>
> I wanted to use DA to rename the many files to use a 272 prefix, but found
> it very tedious. Instead, I used the Win2K CMD shell and used the ren
> commnad "ren 217*.* 272*.*"
>
> Presto. You have to nurse the assembly upon first opening, but it seems
> light years faster than using DA. But, like I said, perhaps I'm missing
> something. Any feedback from more enlightened users?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
*Hintehoeller, Richard
Re: Renaming files using DA vs ren command
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-05-2002 08:50 PM in reply to:
*Cook, Gary
Gary:
The only downside to this approach that I can think of is that the
Properties>Project>Part Number will not pick up the change.
When you generate the Bill of Materials, you may be picking up this
property and it will show the obsolete value.
Otherwise, it certainly is the quickest way I've come across for
accomplishing your goal.
Richard
The only downside to this approach that I can think of is that the
Properties>Project>Part Number will not pick up the change.
When you generate the Bill of Materials, you may be picking up this
property and it will show the obsolete value.
Otherwise, it certainly is the quickest way I've come across for
accomplishing your goal.
Richard
