Autodesk Inventor
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
*Hinterhoeller, Richard
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-26-2002 02:30 AM in reply to:
ermin
Leo
> I believe, all the hassle is not realy worth it.
The more I've thought about mirror, the more I can see the steps you go
through as not being worth it.
I can see that either you'll get asked too many questions, or if IV can
actually automate it there will be times when you wish it wouldn't.
Richard
> I believe, all the hassle is not realy worth it.
The more I've thought about mirror, the more I can see the steps you go
through as not being worth it.
I can see that either you'll get asked too many questions, or if IV can
actually automate it there will be times when you wish it wouldn't.
Richard
*Laimer, Leo
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-26-2002 03:13 AM in reply to:
ermin
Thats the common sense here after many discussions.
But What I really would like to see in IV, just in addition to the
derive/mirror:
make any part, make a idw off it.
mirror the part in a way, that all sketches/features stay intact, but
mirrored, and keep the idw associated to it (better yet, rename both in DA
before mirror)
So you end up with a mirrored part, fully parametric, with a finished idw
(may need some cleanup though), but with NO parametric relation to the first
part.
This feature would save me a lot of work on occassion.
I've done this in MDT many times with great success!
Regards,
--
Leo Laimer
Maschinen- und Fertigungstechnik
A-4820 Bad Ischl - Austria
"Richard Hinterhoeller" schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:3DE3BDD9.9050808@hfx.eastlink.ca...
> Leo
>
> > I believe, all the hassle is not realy worth it.
>
> The more I've thought about mirror, the more I can see the steps you go
> through as not being worth it.
>
> I can see that either you'll get asked too many questions, or if IV can
> actually automate it there will be times when you wish it wouldn't.
>
> Richard
>
But What I really would like to see in IV, just in addition to the
derive/mirror:
make any part, make a idw off it.
mirror the part in a way, that all sketches/features stay intact, but
mirrored, and keep the idw associated to it (better yet, rename both in DA
before mirror)
So you end up with a mirrored part, fully parametric, with a finished idw
(may need some cleanup though), but with NO parametric relation to the first
part.
This feature would save me a lot of work on occassion.
I've done this in MDT many times with great success!
Regards,
--
Leo Laimer
Maschinen- und Fertigungstechnik
A-4820 Bad Ischl - Austria
"Richard Hinterhoeller"
Newsbeitrag news:3DE3BDD9.9050808@hfx.eastlink.ca...
> Leo
>
> > I believe, all the hassle is not realy worth it.
>
> The more I've thought about mirror, the more I can see the steps you go
> through as not being worth it.
>
> I can see that either you'll get asked too many questions, or if IV can
> actually automate it there will be times when you wish it wouldn't.
>
> Richard
>


