• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • Autodesk Inventor

    Reply
    *J, Dave

    Automated Machine construction

    35 Views, 5 Replies
    11-27-2002 06:01 AM
    Is it possible to specify and constrain a certain number of instances of a part
    determined by some variable? We build roller conveyors, and wanted to automate
    our "standard" conveyor construction. The idea is that we would save time
    continually making like conveyors. Say we wanted a conveyor 10' long with 6"
    between rollers, and some other user input. IV would draw all the conveyor with
    the right number of rollers and shafts, etc. Seems like a VB problem, but as I
    am VB illiterate, and my company is small (read: poor), I was hoping I could get
    some help from this friendly newsgroup. Thanks in advance.

    --
    Dave Jacquemotte
    davej@autoconcorp.com
    Please use plain text.
    *AutoCOL

    Re: Automated Machine construction

    11-27-2002 06:17 AM in reply to: *J, Dave
    sounds like you need to use a component pattern which is associative to a
    feature pattern.

    if you have a cutout in a mount which is then patterned along the mount, you
    can then associate a pattern of rollers to those cutouts. if the number of
    cutouts changes, so does the number of rollers.

    you should be able to do what you're hoping to without VB (just using some
    parametric equations) unless there is some specific problem in the way?

    col.
    Please use plain text.
    *J, Dave

    Re:

    11-27-2002 06:21 AM in reply to: *J, Dave
    Good idea. Thanks!

    --
    Dave Jacquemotte
    davej@autoconcorp.com


    "AutoCOL" wrote in message
    news:F19EFBBFD710158DC4F4B27AD71E161C@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > sounds like you need to use a component pattern which is associative to a
    > feature pattern.
    >
    > if you have a cutout in a mount which is then patterned along the mount, you
    > can then associate a pattern of rollers to those cutouts. if the number of
    > cutouts changes, so does the number of rollers.
    >
    > you should be able to do what you're hoping to without VB (just using some
    > parametric equations) unless there is some specific problem in the way?
    >
    > col.
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Dotson, Sean

    Re:

    11-27-2002 12:10 PM in reply to: *J, Dave
    I agree. You don't need VB. Control it by a spreadsheet and you can have
    one model for a bunch of different sizes.

    --
    --
    Sean Dotson, PE
    http://www.sdotson.com
    Check the Inventor FAQ for most common questions
    "AutoCOL" wrote in
    message news:F19EFBBFD710158DC4F4B27AD71E161C@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > sounds like you need to use a component pattern which is associative to a
    > feature pattern.
    >
    > if you have a cutout in a mount which is then patterned along the mount,
    you
    > can then associate a pattern of rollers to those cutouts. if the number of
    > cutouts changes, so does the number of rollers.
    >
    > you should be able to do what you're hoping to without VB (just using some
    > parametric equations) unless there is some specific problem in the way?
    >
    > col.
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Small, Ryan

    Re:

    11-28-2002 02:31 AM in reply to: *J, Dave
    Why not a skeletal assembly which would eliminate both Excel and the need
    for constraints?

    -Ryan


    --
    ----------
    Ryan Small
    Solid Caddgroup Inc.
    Authorized Autodesk Systems Center
    Burlington, Ontario, Canada
    Ph:905-331-9670 Fx:905-331-7280
    http://www.solidcadcam.com
    ryan@solidcadcam.com

    "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
    news:E5C360ECEEC7EAF62F8550CD01407198@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > I agree. You don't need VB. Control it by a spreadsheet and you can have
    > one model for a bunch of different sizes.
    Please use plain text.
    *Dotson, Sean

    Re:

    11-29-2002 12:04 AM in reply to: *J, Dave
    I suggested Excel as it's an easy way for multiple users to control an
    assembly easily without knowledge of how it was constructed. Skeletal
    modeling is a bit more advanced and has it's share of gotchas.

    True, either will work but if it were me I'd stick with linked params...

    --
    --
    Sean Dotson, PE
    http://www.sdotson.com
    Check the Inventor FAQ for most common questions
    "Ryan Small" wrote in message
    news:3BC79A2AC31343531802877344590DD5@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    >
    > Why not a skeletal assembly which would eliminate both Excel and the need
    > for constraints?
    >
    > -Ryan
    >
    >
    > --
    > ----------
    > Ryan Small
    > Solid Caddgroup Inc.
    > Authorized Autodesk Systems Center
    > Burlington, Ontario, Canada
    > Ph:905-331-9670 Fx:905-331-7280
    > http://www.solidcadcam.com
    > ryan@solidcadcam.com
    >
    > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
    > news:E5C360ECEEC7EAF62F8550CD01407198@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > I agree. You don't need VB. Control it by a spreadsheet and you can
    have
    > > one model for a bunch of different sizes.
    >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.