• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • Discussion Groups

    Autodesk Inventor

    Reply
    Active Member
    zakaronius
    Posts: 10
    Registered: ‎10-05-2010

    Another flattening riddle

    155 Views, 4 Replies
    08-06-2012 09:21 AM

    I am trying to model a hollow curved disk as we would build it; faces cut form 1/8" material and roll formed and a return of.0625 thickness spanning the two.  The three parts were devived from disk3.ipt.   The faces both flatten.  The return thinks it flattened but did not.  Each of the 3 parts has its sheet metal rules thicknes set to "thickness".  I have learned a bit searching for someone's simalar problem but not solved my own.  I am pretty sure that this will flatten without deformation.

     

    Any insight would be appreciated.

     

    Thanks,

     

    Zak

    Please use plain text.
    *Expert Elite*
    mrattray
    Posts: 1,485
    Registered: ‎09-13-2011

    Re: Another flattening riddle

    08-06-2012 09:27 AM in reply to: zakaronius

    Inventor can't unfold that.

    Mike (not Matt) Rattray

    Please use plain text.
    Active Member
    zakaronius
    Posts: 10
    Registered: ‎10-05-2010

    Re: Another flattening riddle

    08-06-2012 09:46 AM in reply to: zakaronius

    Thanks for the quick response.

    It seems that Inventor 2013 can not unfold this yet I find that very hard to believe.

    Considering Dr Mather's comment regarding part2:

    http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Inventor/How-can-I-flatten-these/m-p/3465526/highlight/true#M...

     

    ..MIGHT be able to be flattenned;  clearly part2 has compound curves.  I would have thought it impossible to flatten without deformation.  My return seems to me as it would lay flat as anything.  I guess I'll try something different to prove or disprove that notion.

     

    Thanks.

    Please use plain text.
    Active Member
    zakaronius
    Posts: 10
    Registered: ‎10-05-2010

    Re: Another flattening riddle

    08-06-2012 10:37 AM in reply to: zakaronius

    Yup.  You are right, Mike.  Thanks

     

     

    Please use plain text.
    Active Member
    zakaronius
    Posts: 10
    Registered: ‎10-05-2010

    Re: Another flattening riddle

    08-08-2012 05:56 AM in reply to: zakaronius

    Still trying to solve what, seems to me, ought to be a simple problem.

    Attached is a new version of the return that would not flatten.  A sweep rather than a patch between two surfaces.

    No deleted faces.  Sheet metal environment  Thickness matches SM rule...

     

    I exported this to Rhino where it does flatten yet it still will not in Inv2013.

     

    Any insight?

     

    Thanks in advance...

    Please use plain text.