Autodesk Inventor

[#1]

You could choose to wait for the big one while some
could still benefit from the small ones.

Dave

style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

"guzie" <guzie@triton.net>
wrote in message
href="news:f12043d.10@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f12043d.10@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...

I
was just going to type the same thing. On top of that each service pack needs
testing time before deployment. Fewer SP means getting some more time to test
them before deployment. Every patch they send out also has to be deployed
across the company user base. For a large company this can be quite a bit of
work. My IS department would kill me if we ran into the number of SP that SW
typically has. I wouldn't want the quick hotfix approach of heres a bug, fix
it and quickly throw out a patch.

[#2]

Red herring....

Dave

"Sean Dotson" wrote in message
news:276099780228E9E429B74EBB0669B595@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> "I know you run the chance of something else "breaking" with a service
pack
> but in my opinion it is worth the risk."
>
> So in your opinion it would be "worth the risk" to get a SP to fix the
Excel
> Linking Issue (for example) even if parametrics stopped working all
> together? I don't think this would be a very popular view.
>
> --
> Sean Dotson, PE
> http://www.sdotson.com
> ...sleep is for the weak..
> -----------------------------------------
> "Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
> news:4CAB2AFACE45D233893ED3245ED10D25@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > What's the difference between 15 small service packs and 2 or 3 large
> > service packs. The difference is they release them as the problems get
> > found and fixed instead of sitting on the solution until there is a
large
> > enough amount to issue a SP. I know you run the chance of something else
> > "breaking" with a service pack but in my opinion it is worth the risk.
> >
> > "Purge" wrote in message
> > news:2B9062CFA565EE6E980AF0D677C5E751@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > But how many SP's do they need to have the product be stable? A lot. I
> > > personally have not seen any Autodesk SP's go pass 4. Correctly me if
I
> am
>
>

[#3]

My preference as well.

=======================

"Leo Laimer" wrote in message
news:BDE3CBBA6D5546C5CC028C906CF5831F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
..................
better stability and quality of the package, over a faster release cycle.
................

[#4]

This is not a red herring Dave. Exaggeration for effect possibly but not a
red herring.

Red Herring: a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to
divert attention from the original issue.

I was addressing a point in his argument. In my opinion it is not
acceptable for a SP to fix one issue and break another. I don't see how
that's irrelevant.

The march must be forward only. If that means only 1 or 2 big SPs then so
be it. These are my opinions. If you disagree that is your right. However
I'd get my fallacies straight before casting stones.

--
Sean Dotson, PE
http://www.sdotson.com
...sleep is for the weak..
-----------------------------------------
"David Radlin" wrote in message
newsA453CFF836743B49944CFEC1122BA34@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Red herring....
>
> Dave
>
> "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> news:276099780228E9E429B74EBB0669B595@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > "I know you run the chance of something else "breaking" with a service
> pack
> > but in my opinion it is worth the risk."
> >
> > So in your opinion it would be "worth the risk" to get a SP to fix the
> Excel
> > Linking Issue (for example) even if parametrics stopped working all
> > together? I don't think this would be a very popular view.
> >
> > --
> > Sean Dotson, PE
> > http://www.sdotson.com
> > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > -----------------------------------------
> > "Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
> > news:4CAB2AFACE45D233893ED3245ED10D25@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > What's the difference between 15 small service packs and 2 or 3 large
> > > service packs. The difference is they release them as the problems
get
> > > found and fixed instead of sitting on the solution until there is a
> large
> > > enough amount to issue a SP. I know you run the chance of something
else
> > > "breaking" with a service pack but in my opinion it is worth the risk.
> > >
> > > "Purge" wrote in message
> > > news:2B9062CFA565EE6E980AF0D677C5E751@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > But how many SP's do they need to have the product be stable? A lot.
I
> > > > personally have not seen any Autodesk SP's go pass 4. Correctly me
if
> I
> > am
> >
> >
>
>

[#5]

"Exaggeration for effect..." - a fallacy none the less.

Dave

"Sean Dotson" wrote in message
news:B4D8DAFCC62FAD9CC99AE9F8B88A3A37@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> This is not a red herring Dave. Exaggeration for effect possibly but not
a
> red herring.
>
> Red Herring: a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order
to
> divert attention from the original issue.
>
> I was addressing a point in his argument. In my opinion it is not
> acceptable for a SP to fix one issue and break another. I don't see how
> that's irrelevant.
>
> The march must be forward only. If that means only 1 or 2 big SPs then so
> be it. These are my opinions. If you disagree that is your right.
However
> I'd get my fallacies straight before casting stones.
>
> --
> Sean Dotson, PE
> http://www.sdotson.com
> ...sleep is for the weak..
> -----------------------------------------
> "David Radlin" wrote in message
> newsA453CFF836743B49944CFEC1122BA34@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > Red herring....
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > news:276099780228E9E429B74EBB0669B595@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > "I know you run the chance of something else "breaking" with a service
> > pack
> > > but in my opinion it is worth the risk."
> > >
> > > So in your opinion it would be "worth the risk" to get a SP to fix the
> > Excel
> > > Linking Issue (for example) even if parametrics stopped working all
> > > together? I don't think this would be a very popular view.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > "Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
> > > news:4CAB2AFACE45D233893ED3245ED10D25@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > What's the difference between 15 small service packs and 2 or 3
large
> > > > service packs. The difference is they release them as the problems
> get
> > > > found and fixed instead of sitting on the solution until there is a
> > large
> > > > enough amount to issue a SP. I know you run the chance of something
> else
> > > > "breaking" with a service pack but in my opinion it is worth the
risk.
> > > >
> > > > "Purge" wrote in message
> > > > news:2B9062CFA565EE6E980AF0D677C5E751@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > But how many SP's do they need to have the product be stable? A
lot.
> I
> > > > > personally have not seen any Autodesk SP's go pass 4. Correctly me
> if
> > I
> > > am
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

[#6]

actually no...

fal·la·cy Pronunciation Key (fl-s)
n. pl. fal·la·cies
1.. A false notion.
2.. A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference.
3.. Incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness.


--
Sean Dotson, PE
http://www.sdotson.com
...sleep is for the weak..
-----------------------------------------
"David Radlin" wrote in message
news:84D28EA9E8FE2FDF3FF9053822547A4B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> "Exaggeration for effect..." - a fallacy none the less.
>
> Dave
>
> "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> news:B4D8DAFCC62FAD9CC99AE9F8B88A3A37@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > This is not a red herring Dave. Exaggeration for effect possibly but
not
> a
> > red herring.
> >
> > Red Herring: a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in
order
> to
> > divert attention from the original issue.
> >
> > I was addressing a point in his argument. In my opinion it is not
> > acceptable for a SP to fix one issue and break another. I don't see how
> > that's irrelevant.
> >
> > The march must be forward only. If that means only 1 or 2 big SPs then
so
> > be it. These are my opinions. If you disagree that is your right.
> However
> > I'd get my fallacies straight before casting stones.
> >
> > --
> > Sean Dotson, PE
> > http://www.sdotson.com
> > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > -----------------------------------------
> > "David Radlin" wrote in message
> > newsA453CFF836743B49944CFEC1122BA34@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > Red herring....
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > > news:276099780228E9E429B74EBB0669B595@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > "I know you run the chance of something else "breaking" with a
service
> > > pack
> > > > but in my opinion it is worth the risk."
> > > >
> > > > So in your opinion it would be "worth the risk" to get a SP to fix
the
> > > Excel
> > > > Linking Issue (for example) even if parametrics stopped working all
> > > > together? I don't think this would be a very popular view.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > "Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
> > > > news:4CAB2AFACE45D233893ED3245ED10D25@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > What's the difference between 15 small service packs and 2 or 3
> large
> > > > > service packs. The difference is they release them as the
problems
> > get
> > > > > found and fixed instead of sitting on the solution until there is
a
> > > large
> > > > > enough amount to issue a SP. I know you run the chance of
something
> > else
> > > > > "breaking" with a service pack but in my opinion it is worth the
> risk.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Purge" wrote in message
> > > > > news:2B9062CFA565EE6E980AF0D677C5E751@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > But how many SP's do they need to have the product be stable? A
> lot.
> > I
> > > > > > personally have not seen any Autodesk SP's go pass 4. Correctly
me
> > if
> > > I
> > > > am
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

[#7]

Thanks for proving my point...

Dave

"Sean Dotson" wrote in message
news:35DFEA2B4214DE060D621617F900FE8A@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> actually no...
>
> fal·la·cy Pronunciation Key (fl-s)
> n. pl. fal·la·cies
> 1.. A false notion.
> 2.. A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference.
> 3.. Incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness.
>
>
> --
> Sean Dotson, PE
> http://www.sdotson.com
> ...sleep is for the weak..
> -----------------------------------------
> "David Radlin" wrote in message
> news:84D28EA9E8FE2FDF3FF9053822547A4B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > "Exaggeration for effect..." - a fallacy none the less.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > news:B4D8DAFCC62FAD9CC99AE9F8B88A3A37@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > This is not a red herring Dave. Exaggeration for effect possibly but
> not
> > a
> > > red herring.
> > >
> > > Red Herring: a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in
> order
> > to
> > > divert attention from the original issue.
> > >
> > > I was addressing a point in his argument. In my opinion it is not
> > > acceptable for a SP to fix one issue and break another. I don't see
how
> > > that's irrelevant.
> > >
> > > The march must be forward only. If that means only 1 or 2 big SPs
then
> so
> > > be it. These are my opinions. If you disagree that is your right.
> > However
> > > I'd get my fallacies straight before casting stones.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > "David Radlin" wrote in message
> > > newsA453CFF836743B49944CFEC1122BA34@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > Red herring....
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > > > news:276099780228E9E429B74EBB0669B595@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > "I know you run the chance of something else "breaking" with a
> service
> > > > pack
> > > > > but in my opinion it is worth the risk."
> > > > >
> > > > > So in your opinion it would be "worth the risk" to get a SP to fix
> the
> > > > Excel
> > > > > Linking Issue (for example) even if parametrics stopped working
all
> > > > > together? I don't think this would be a very popular view.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > > "Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
> > > > > news:4CAB2AFACE45D233893ED3245ED10D25@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > What's the difference between 15 small service packs and 2 or 3
> > large
> > > > > > service packs. The difference is they release them as the
> problems
> > > get
> > > > > > found and fixed instead of sitting on the solution until there
is
> a
> > > > large
> > > > > > enough amount to issue a SP. I know you run the chance of
> something
> > > else
> > > > > > "breaking" with a service pack but in my opinion it is worth the
> > risk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Purge" wrote in message
> > > > > > news:2B9062CFA565EE6E980AF0D677C5E751@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > > But how many SP's do they need to have the product be stable?
A
> > lot.
> > > I
> > > > > > > personally have not seen any Autodesk SP's go pass 4.
Correctly
> me
> > > if
> > > > I
> > > > > am
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----






----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----






----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----






----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

[#8]

Dave I'm not sure why you are being so combative with me lately but I'm
going to do something I normally don't and let this one die. It's really
not worth arguing about.

(and don't take this a victory on your part, I don't think I proved your
point at all)

--
Sean Dotson, PE
http://www.sdotson.com
...sleep is for the weak..
-----------------------------------------
"David Radlin" wrote in message
news:FD7FFAF35EF7ACA9476172B606D2D5EA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Thanks for proving my point...
>
> Dave
>
> "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> news:35DFEA2B4214DE060D621617F900FE8A@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > actually no...
> >
> > fal·la·cy Pronunciation Key (fl-s)
> > n. pl. fal·la·cies
> > 1.. A false notion.
> > 2.. A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference.
> > 3.. Incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean Dotson, PE
> > http://www.sdotson.com
> > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > -----------------------------------------
> > "David Radlin" wrote in message
> > news:84D28EA9E8FE2FDF3FF9053822547A4B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > "Exaggeration for effect..." - a fallacy none the less.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > > news:B4D8DAFCC62FAD9CC99AE9F8B88A3A37@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > This is not a red herring Dave. Exaggeration for effect possibly
but
> > not
> > > a
> > > > red herring.
> > > >
> > > > Red Herring: a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in
> > order
> > > to
> > > > divert attention from the original issue.
> > > >
> > > > I was addressing a point in his argument. In my opinion it is not
> > > > acceptable for a SP to fix one issue and break another. I don't see
> how
> > > > that's irrelevant.
> > > >
> > > > The march must be forward only. If that means only 1 or 2 big SPs
> then
> > so
> > > > be it. These are my opinions. If you disagree that is your right.
> > > However
> > > > I'd get my fallacies straight before casting stones.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > "David Radlin" wrote in message
> > > > newsA453CFF836743B49944CFEC1122BA34@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > Red herring....
> > > > >
> > > > > Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > > > > news:276099780228E9E429B74EBB0669B595@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > "I know you run the chance of something else "breaking" with a
> > service
> > > > > pack
> > > > > > but in my opinion it is worth the risk."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So in your opinion it would be "worth the risk" to get a SP to
fix
> > the
> > > > > Excel
> > > > > > Linking Issue (for example) even if parametrics stopped working
> all
> > > > > > together? I don't think this would be a very popular view.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > > > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > > > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > > > "Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:4CAB2AFACE45D233893ED3245ED10D25@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > > What's the difference between 15 small service packs and 2 or
3
> > > large
> > > > > > > service packs. The difference is they release them as the
> > problems
> > > > get
> > > > > > > found and fixed instead of sitting on the solution until there
> is
> > a
> > > > > large
> > > > > > > enough amount to issue a SP. I know you run the chance of
> > something
> > > > else
> > > > > > > "breaking" with a service pack but in my opinion it is worth
the
> > > risk.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Purge" wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:2B9062CFA565EE6E980AF0D677C5E751@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > > > But how many SP's do they need to have the product be
stable?
> A
> > > lot.
> > > > I
> > > > > > > > personally have not seen any Autodesk SP's go pass 4.
> Correctly
> > me
> > > > if
> > > > > I
> > > > > > am
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
>
>
>
>

[#9]

My thinking is there is there would be a SMALL risk in the SP causing
problems. Yes, I would be willing to take a SMALL risk to get some of my
problems fixed sooner.

"Sean Dotson" wrote in message
news:276099780228E9E429B74EBB0669B595@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> "I know you run the chance of something else "breaking" with a service
pack
> but in my opinion it is worth the risk."
>
> So in your opinion it would be "worth the risk" to get a SP to fix the
Excel
> Linking Issue (for example) even if parametrics stopped working all
> together? I don't think this would be a very popular view.
>
> --
> Sean Dotson, PE
> http://www.sdotson.com
> ...sleep is for the weak..
> -----------------------------------------
> "Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
> news:4CAB2AFACE45D233893ED3245ED10D25@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > What's the difference between 15 small service packs and 2 or 3 large
> > service packs. The difference is they release them as the problems get
> > found and fixed instead of sitting on the solution until there is a
large
> > enough amount to issue a SP. I know you run the chance of something else
> > "breaking" with a service pack but in my opinion it is worth the risk.
> >
> > "Purge" wrote in message
> > news:2B9062CFA565EE6E980AF0D677C5E751@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > But how many SP's do they need to have the product be stable? A lot. I
> > > personally have not seen any Autodesk SP's go pass 4. Correctly me if
I
> am
>
>

[#10]

Just having fun with you Sean, don't take it personally... that would be a
shame (vbg).

Dave

"Sean Dotson" wrote in message
news:07F119829832E2B869C1FE5B49DEF5A3@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Dave I'm not sure why you are being so combative with me lately but I'm
> going to do something I normally don't and let this one die. It's really
> not worth arguing about.
>
> (and don't take this a victory on your part, I don't think I proved your
> point at all)
>
> --
> Sean Dotson, PE
> http://www.sdotson.com
> ...sleep is for the weak..
> -----------------------------------------
> "David Radlin" wrote in message
> news:FD7FFAF35EF7ACA9476172B606D2D5EA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > Thanks for proving my point...
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > news:35DFEA2B4214DE060D621617F900FE8A@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > actually no...
> > >
> > > fal·la·cy Pronunciation Key (fl-s)
> > > n. pl. fal·la·cies
> > > 1.. A false notion.
> > > 2.. A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid
inference.
> > > 3.. Incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > "David Radlin" wrote in message
> > > news:84D28EA9E8FE2FDF3FF9053822547A4B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > "Exaggeration for effect..." - a fallacy none the less.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > > > news:B4D8DAFCC62FAD9CC99AE9F8B88A3A37@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > This is not a red herring Dave. Exaggeration for effect possibly
> but
> > > not
> > > > a
> > > > > red herring.
> > > > >
> > > > > Red Herring: a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented
in
> > > order
> > > > to
> > > > > divert attention from the original issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was addressing a point in his argument. In my opinion it is not
> > > > > acceptable for a SP to fix one issue and break another. I don't
see
> > how
> > > > > that's irrelevant.
> > > > >
> > > > > The march must be forward only. If that means only 1 or 2 big SPs
> > then
> > > so
> > > > > be it. These are my opinions. If you disagree that is your
right.
> > > > However
> > > > > I'd get my fallacies straight before casting stones.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > > "David Radlin" wrote in message
> > > > > newsA453CFF836743B49944CFEC1122BA34@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > Red herring....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dave
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Sean Dotson" wrote in message
> > > > > > news:276099780228E9E429B74EBB0669B595@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > > "I know you run the chance of something else "breaking" with a
> > > service
> > > > > > pack
> > > > > > > but in my opinion it is worth the risk."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So in your opinion it would be "worth the risk" to get a SP to
> fix
> > > the
> > > > > > Excel
> > > > > > > Linking Issue (for example) even if parametrics stopped
working
> > all
> > > > > > > together? I don't think this would be a very popular view.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Sean Dotson, PE
> > > > > > > http://www.sdotson.com
> > > > > > > ...sleep is for the weak..
> > > > > > > -----------------------------------------
> > > > > > > "Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:4CAB2AFACE45D233893ED3245ED10D25@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > > > What's the difference between 15 small service packs and 2
or
> 3
> > > > large
> > > > > > > > service packs. The difference is they release them as the
> > > problems
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > > found and fixed instead of sitting on the solution until
there
> > is
> > > a
> > > > > > large
> > > > > > > > enough amount to issue a SP. I know you run the chance of
> > > something
> > > > > else
> > > > > > > > "breaking" with a service pack but in my opinion it is worth
> the
> > > > risk.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "Purge" wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:2B9062CFA565EE6E980AF0D677C5E751@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > > > > > > > But how many SP's do they need to have the product be
> stable?
> > A
> > > > lot.
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > personally have not seen any Autodesk SP's go pass 4.
> > Correctly
> > > me
> > > > > if
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > am
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ----
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ----
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ----
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ----
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>