Autodesk Inventor
I'm just beginning to study these new specifications myself, but as you were
saying, the rise/fall numbers are important. If I remember correctly, the
Planar was 10/15 (or visa versa) for a total of 25 and a constrast of 500:1.
As far as the aspect ratio, I don't know. I think a standard CRT is 4:3. I
guess the 16:10 might fit a standard drafting layout a little better? Let
me know how it works out if you purchase. I hope to place an order before
the end of the year.
"Leo Laimer" wrote in message
news
7C174F725836F4222C93408D5BE3544@in.WebX.maYIadrTaR
> Jimmy,
> My concern was about the refresh time of 20+20ms (ascend/descend) that is
> stated in the specs of Sony. Somebody in this NG said that one should
never
> have more than 20ms in order to not have a blurr on moving assemblies, and
> was not sure about 20+20ms would be good enough.
> Well, yesterday I checked with a friend who has a 4yrs old 18" Elsa TFT
that
> says 45ms typical, and this flatscreen works just great!
>
> Just had a look at the Planar thing, and what comes in mind is the
different
> proportion (Planar has 4:3, Sony has 16:10). The price is very
interesting,
> though.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Leo Laimer
> Maschinen- und Fertigungstechnik
> A-4820 Bad Ischl - Austria
>
>
> "Jimmy Carr" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:65C1140CBDA7DCF455687F7FAF5A87DA@in.WebX.maYI
> > No, but I'm looking hard. Right now interested in the Planar 23.1 UXGA
.
> > Incredible specifications at the same cost. We have some of the smaller
> > ones here at work and they are sharp.
> >
> >
> > "Leo Laimer" wrote in message
> > news:49B9B51E033FE52D934226B14D08E4BD@in.WebX.maYI
> > > Group,
> > > Anybody out there running a Sony 23" flat screen SDM-P232W and would
> like
> > to
> > > share his experience?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Leo Laimer
> > > Maschinen- und Fertigungstechnik
> > > A-4820 Bad Ischl - Austria
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
saying, the rise/fall numbers are important. If I remember correctly, the
Planar was 10/15 (or visa versa) for a total of 25 and a constrast of 500:1.
As far as the aspect ratio, I don't know. I think a standard CRT is 4:3. I
guess the 16:10 might fit a standard drafting layout a little better? Let
me know how it works out if you purchase. I hope to place an order before
the end of the year.
"Leo Laimer"
news
7C174F725836F4222C93408D5BE3544@in.WebX.maYIadrTaR> Jimmy,
> My concern was about the refresh time of 20+20ms (ascend/descend) that is
> stated in the specs of Sony. Somebody in this NG said that one should
never
> have more than 20ms in order to not have a blurr on moving assemblies, and
> was not sure about 20+20ms would be good enough.
> Well, yesterday I checked with a friend who has a 4yrs old 18" Elsa TFT
that
> says 45ms typical, and this flatscreen works just great!
>
> Just had a look at the Planar thing, and what comes in mind is the
different
> proportion (Planar has 4:3, Sony has 16:10). The price is very
interesting,
> though.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Leo Laimer
> Maschinen- und Fertigungstechnik
> A-4820 Bad Ischl - Austria
>
>
> "Jimmy Carr"
> news:65C1140CBDA7DCF455687F7FAF5A87DA@in.WebX.maYI
> > No, but I'm looking hard. Right now interested in the Planar 23.1 UXGA
.
> > Incredible specifications at the same cost. We have some of the smaller
> > ones here at work and they are sharp.
> >
> >
> > "Leo Laimer"
> > news:49B9B51E033FE52D934226B14D08E4BD@in.WebX.maYI
> > > Group,
> > > Anybody out there running a Sony 23" flat screen SDM-P232W and would
> like
> > to
> > > share his experience?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Leo Laimer
> > > Maschinen- und Fertigungstechnik
> > > A-4820 Bad Ischl - Austria
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
