Autodesk Ecotect Analysis - Desktop Tools
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
EnergyPlus via Ecotect
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I am using Ecotect to run thermal analysis in EnergyPlus - I am new to this.
I have made a number of simple test models - in each of them I get the following severe error:
** Severe ** GetInternalHeatGains: ElectricEquipment="ZONE_1_EQUIP", invalid Design Level Calculation Method, value =EQUIPMENT LEVEL
** ~~~ ** ...Valid values are "EquipmentLevel", "Watts/Area", "Watts/Person".
Sine I get the same error in any kind of simple tests I did, I assume I am missing some basic step in setting the model.
How should I control the setting for the ElectricEquipment of thermal zones? (Attached the current setting for internal gains).
Thank you,
Michela
Re: EnergyPlus via Ecotect
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
It seems there are possibly two problems in the idf file generated by Ecotect?
1) Following a comment by EnergyPlus’ support, I see the idf file generated by Ecotect contains the name: “Equipment Level" instead of "EquipmentLevel". This remains as such once the idf is converted from version 3.0.0 (Ecotect) to 7.1.0 (current EnergyPlus). So, I correct this manually by editing the idf as txt. Once done that, then the problem mentioned in my former message is solved. However, a second problem occurs:
2) ** Severe ** GetSimpleAirModelInputs: ZoneInfiltration
esignFlowRate="ZONE_1_INFILT", invalid calculation method=ACH . I have tried to substitute manually in txt “ACH” with “Flow/Zone” in the idf generated by Ecotect, then the file runs properly in EnergyPlus. However, I am not aware if ACH was meant for something different than recalling the Design Flow Rate Calculation Method “Flow/Zone” ?
I will ask about this second problem to the EnergyPlus’ support too – but it seems both issues originate in Ecotect?
Thanks for some help on this.
Michela
