layer keys for ADT 3.0

[Anonymous]

Is there a way to create a new layer key to suit what you do, without all the stuff that ADT 3 puts into it?

[Anonymous]

you can add items to the layerkey from the StyleManager..

Type AecLayerKeyStyle
then double click on the layerkey you want to edit and add the items you
want.

You only need the KeyName, LayerName, Color, Linetype.

Is there something else specific you like to do?

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Starz
Plogv 3.0 & 2000 (plot logging) for r14 & 2000
***Enhancement Tools for Arch. Desktop *****
!!!!!Beta Testers Needed For DormerX!!!!!!!
http://www.stardsign.com/main.htm

[Anonymous]

Thanks.
I would like to create a key that only has the things that I need. Window assemblies are something that we may never use. Same with door, toilet and window tags. These keys can't be purged. Basically, I was wondering if I could.

[Anonymous]

All the Keys that cannot be deleted are required by ADT.
Sorry about the bad news....

--
mark webb
software engineer
building industry division, autodesk



"odster" wrote in message
news:f068047.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Thanks.
> I would like to create a key that only has the things that I need. Window
assemblies are something that we may never use. Same with door, toilet and
window tags. These keys can't be purged. Basically, I was wondering if I
could.
>

[Anonymous]

However,
The keys that you manually add can be deleted later if necessary.

mark webb, autodesk wrote in message
news:4C417FBAED7DE35E617436545C2DADF4@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> All the Keys that cannot be deleted are required by ADT.
> Sorry about the bad news....
>
> --
> mark webb
> software engineer
> building industry division, autodesk
>
>
>
> "odster" wrote in message
> news:f068047.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > Thanks.
> > I would like to create a key that only has the things that I need.
Window
> assemblies are something that we may never use. Same with door, toilet and
> window tags. These keys can't be purged. Basically, I was wondering if I
> could.
> >
>
>