AutoCAD Plant 3D Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s AutoCAD Plant 3D Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular AutoCAD Plant 3D topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

aaarggggg crap content

13 REPLIES 13
Reply
Message 1 of 14
Anonymous
737 Views, 13 Replies

aaarggggg crap content

2012....still no metric based threaded nozzles in the acat

 

 

Tags (2)
13 REPLIES 13
Message 2 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

You can migrate the catalog of Nozzles from 2011... but I don't understand why in 2012 there isn't this kind of nozzles.

Message 3 of 14
rajsekarpillai
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi,

I would like to understand your metric content requirement in detailed.

Can you describe the metric threaded flange standards that you are looking for?

 

Thanks & Regards,



S. R. Rajasekaran
Product Manager
Plant Solutions - AEC
Autodesk, Inc.

Message 4 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: rajsekarpillai

Equipment often have threaded nozzles

Both male and female

in all types of threads...in Australia mainly BSP (NPT is often used also)

BSP and NPT are usually refered to only using the metric sizes [we call it a 50 not a 2" and not usually 2"(50) or 50(2")]

 

The nozzle.acat does not have nor does it look like it has capability to add THDM nozzles at all

It appears to have a couple of asme THDF nozzles, but they are inch based not metric (the edit inch cat in metric units is NOT satisfactory) and dont seem to work at all.

At the moment the only way i can get a male metric BSP nozzle is to add a piece of threaded pipe (unassigned) to equipment model...craps out the iso though

Message 5 of 14
rajsekarpillai
in reply to: Anonymous

Thanks for your prompt reply!

I would like to work with you to address the issue.

I can help you to create the THRD flange in the nozzle catalog.

Please contact me:  s.r.rajasekaran@autodesk.com or plant.content@autodesk.com

 

Thanks & Regards,



S. R. Rajasekaran
Product Manager
Plant Solutions - AEC
Autodesk, Inc.

Message 6 of 14
dgorsman
in reply to: rajsekarpillai

DN isn't the only "metric" size in use - metric OD (e.g. 60.3) is also needed, particularly with CSA based standards.

----------------------------------
If you are going to fly by the seat of your pants, expect friction burns.
"I don't know" is the beginning of knowledge, not the end.


Message 7 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: dgorsman

You can create in the nozzle catalog a copy of one of the exist DIN nozzles, and then change the END type to THDF or THDM.

Sin título.png

Message 8 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

thats a 4".....are you using a metric/imperial project.

I need metric nozzles....for a metric project

 

That also looks like 2012....need to finish the project in 2011

Message 9 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

I actually ran into this as well, but the pull down menu only has THDF, no THDM (P3D 2012)

Message 10 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Here is a screenshot of the pull down of the "End Type" which shows only THDF

Message 11 of 14
PeterQuinn
in reply to: Anonymous

Thanks for everyone's feedback on this topic. We're working on a content pack to resolve this. I can't give you a date, but I can tell you that a content pack is planned.



Peter Quinn
Senior Product Manager
Autodesk, Inc.

Message 12 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


pkw167 escribió:

Here is a screenshot of the pull down of the "End Type" which shows only THDF



The THDF connection there isn't in your list because you don't have add any nozzle with this connection. Go to Spec Editor and add nozzle with this connection.

Message 13 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: PeterQuinn

Thanks Peter,

I have a couple of projects due out soon that have these connections.

It would be great if at least a sample piece of content could be created ASAP and put up on the content area so we can copy and create a couple of our own, with the full content as autodesk sees fit to create coming as an update late.

Cheers

Richard

 

Message 14 of 14
Anonymous
in reply to: PeterQuinn


@PeterQuinn wrote:

Thanks for everyone's feedback on this topic. We're working on a content pack to resolve this. I can't give you a date, but I can tell you that a content pack is planned.


 

ahhh...just added one in 2012...Smiley Happy

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report

”Boost