Hello
when I use _.plantpipeadd I can draw a line between fittings with a difference of 0.0001 mm for example. (Where these differences come from I'm wondering every time)
When I try to connect two parts with the same difference using plantconnectjoint, it does not work.
So I have to delete the pipe and insert it again... 😞
What is to do?
G
I too need solution for this, even 0.5mm difference causing pipe and fitting disconnection. Where to set the tolerence?
I have been waiting for reply from Autodesk PPl, but asusual no reply.
We need more interaction from Autodesk ppl also here, if you find only users are sharing their views.
If you want to develop the software, please keep interacting here.
You'll need to play with th joint settings in the DefaultConnectorsConfig.xml in the project folder. Each joint has an Offset and Slope tolerance. You can play with these values and see if it clears up your issues.
Is this a buttweld joint? Can you post your connectors config file?
As Dave said: Can you send us the connectors config file? Also the information what kind of joint you have used?
Regards
Bernd
Sorry for my late reply here. Attached the requested file.
The joint connection tolerance required is for Buttweld.
I tried, but it is not getting connected.
Hi,
I have the same problem. I get an error message "Autorouting can not find any paths", though I do not want autorouting to find it. I want to connect A to B with a slope.
I tried to increase slope and offset tolerances for Buttweld i DefaultConnectorsConfig, but that didn´t help.
Best regards
//Johan
I've spoken with the product manager, and submitted a case for this, as it seems to be a bug for everyone.
I have the same problem. Sometimes I spend a lot of time to connect two adjacent lines with 0.001mm of difference!
For while, the only way to solve it is reroute the pipeline.
A solution for this would be great.
Best Regards
Fernando
Bringing back and old post......
I know that this was a bug in 2014. Straight from Autodesk "OffsetTolerance doesn’t seem to work currently!". We're about to migrate to 2015 and I'm wondering if this is something that they felt was important enough to fix for 2015? Anyone have enough experience with 2015 yet to know?
Autodesk: Please refer to [CaseNo:09164512.]