AutoCAD MEP
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
*Bernhardt, Kyle
Strainer?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
98 Views, 3 Replies
08-14-2003 12:51 AM
Could Autodesk have forgotten to include the Pipe Strainer in their creation
of the MvPart library?? If so, then why? Let me know if I've just somehow
missed it
--
Kyle Bernhardt
Mechanical Engineer
Dagher Engineering
29 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
of the MvPart library?? If so, then why? Let me know if I've just somehow
missed it
--
Kyle Bernhardt
Mechanical Engineer
Dagher Engineering
29 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
*Bernhardt, Kyle
Re: Strainer?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-14-2003 12:56 AM in reply to:
*Bernhardt, Kyle
I stand corrected, although the part is not considered a valve, but
mechanical equipment. There's a basket strainer, but we never use those
types, has anybody created a normal, y-type strainer?
--
Kyle Bernhardt
Mechanical Engineer
Dagher Engineering
29 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
mechanical equipment. There's a basket strainer, but we never use those
types, has anybody created a normal, y-type strainer?
--
Kyle Bernhardt
Mechanical Engineer
Dagher Engineering
29 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-14-2003 05:42 AM in reply to:
*Bernhardt, Kyle
I complained to them about the limited catalogs. Their response was to explain how quick and simple it is to make new parts. If it's so fast and simple then why don't they have a couple guys take a day or two to whip out the basic parts. Having 1 size of a part is worthless. Why have the 20 people that bought this software, spin their wheels duplicating each others efforts, when you can have 1 person who knows what their doing whip them out in a fraction of the time. It just doesn't make sense, especially for the price they are charging.
*[Autodesk], jason martin
Re:
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-14-2003 11:22 PM in reply to:
*Bernhardt, Kyle
Could you please send me cut sheets, including dimensions of the strainer
that you are looking for and I will try to build it.
Thanks.
jason
"jmcfaddn" wrote in message
news:f181572.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> I complained to them about the limited catalogs. Their response was to
explain how quick and simple it is to make new parts. If it's so fast and
simple then why don't they have a couple guys take a day or two to whip out
the basic parts. Having 1 size of a part is worthless. Why have the 20
people that bought this software, spin their wheels duplicating each others
efforts, when you can have 1 person who knows what their doing whip them out
in a fraction of the time. It just doesn't make sense, especially for the
price they are charging.
that you are looking for and I will try to build it.
Thanks.
jason
"jmcfaddn"
news:f181572.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> I complained to them about the limited catalogs. Their response was to
explain how quick and simple it is to make new parts. If it's so fast and
simple then why don't they have a couple guys take a day or two to whip out
the basic parts. Having 1 size of a part is worthless. Why have the 20
people that bought this software, spin their wheels duplicating each others
efforts, when you can have 1 person who knows what their doing whip them out
in a fraction of the time. It just doesn't make sense, especially for the
price they are charging.
