• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • Discussion Groups

    AutoCAD MEP

    Reply
    Distinguished Contributor
    Posts: 179
    Registered: 12-23-2004

    MOVE TO REVIT MEP FROM ACAD MEP ?

    1111 Views, 2 Replies
    03-13-2008 09:55 AM
    If Architectural plans are not Revit but 2D autocad, is it ok to use Revit MEP? If there is someone who use in this way, what would your advice be?

    We’ve been using Acad MEP for a long time, however, we have some difficulties to make the program do duct and sprinkler calculation. We cannot draw 3D sanitary installation and do plumbing according to cooling and heating calculations. Will we be able to do all of these by using Revit Mep?
    Employee
    Posts: 1,245
    Registered: 11-16-2005

    Re: MOVE TO REVIT MEP FROM ACAD MEP ?

    03-13-2008 11:09 AM in reply to: saudek
    There really is not a recommended workflow where you use Revit MEP where you don't have a Revit Architecture model.

    The whole initial benefit of using RMEP with the Architectural model is that you have the entire building defined to be able to do initial heating/cooling load analysis, area take offs, study the building's geometry by easily creating sections, etc. If you have no architectural model, you really have none of this data to work from.... thus, there is no potential to run heating/cooling loads, etc.

    Revit MEP provides no functionality w/ regard to Sprinkler Calculations. You can use Elite Fire with AutoCAD MEP to do sprinkler calculations, however. In addition to Velocity and Friction calcs found in AutoCAD MEP, Revit MEP also provides Static Regain and Equal Friction based calculations. However, via 3rd party tools such as Trane Duct or Elite Ductsize, I believe you can achieve the same in AutoCAD MEP.

    I'm not sure what you mean by plumbing according to heating and cooling calculations. Piping in Revit is sized similar to duct, using friction or velocity as the basis of the calculation. You still need to specify the design requirements w/ regard to flow, etc, based on the thermal load... i.e., there is no relationship between the building/space load and the piping flows.

    I have seen a some instances where the MEP was prime on a project, and it was a relatively simple building, that they modeled it on their own... but this would be the exception rather than the rule.


    Martin Schmid, P.E.
    Industry Success Manager
    Architecture, Engineering, and Construction
    Autodesk, Inc.

    *Karl Maas

    Re: MOVE TO REVIT MEP FROM ACAD MEP ?

    03-14-2008 08:50 AM in reply to: saudek
    I too have Revit MEP and have noticed that you need a building model. The
    software allows you to build one but I didn't see that it allowed you to add
    the building structure. Is the structural steel only available in Revit
    Structure? Meanwhile I have resorted to using AutoCAD MEP.

    wrote in message
    news:5875092@discussion.autodesk.com...
    There really is not a recommended workflow where you use Revit MEP where you
    don't have a Revit Architecture model.

    The whole initial benefit of using RMEP with the Architectural model is that
    you have the entire building defined to be able to do initial
    heating/cooling load analysis, area take offs, study the building's geometry
    by easily creating sections, etc. If you have no architectural model, you
    really have none of this data to work from.... thus, there is no potential
    to run heating/cooling loads, etc.

    Revit MEP provides no functionality w/ regard to Sprinkler Calculations.
    You can use Elite Fire with AutoCAD MEP to do sprinkler calculations,
    however. In addition to Velocity and Friction calcs found in AutoCAD MEP,
    Revit MEP also provides Static Regain and Equal Friction based calculations.
    However, via 3rd party tools such as Trane Duct or Elite Ductsize, I believe
    you can achieve the same in AutoCAD MEP.

    I'm not sure what you mean by plumbing according to heating and cooling
    calculations. Piping in Revit is sized similar to duct, using friction or
    velocity as the basis of the calculation. You still need to specify the
    design requirements w/ regard to flow, etc, based on the thermal load...
    i.e., there is no relationship between the building/space load and the
    piping flows.

    I have seen a some instances where the MEP was prime on a project, and it
    was a relatively simple building, that they modeled it on their own... but
    this would be the exception rather than the rule.