• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • AutoCAD MEP Wishes

    Reply
    *Andrew

    Connection Points

    45 Views, 7 Replies
    11-04-2003 01:29 AM
    When specifying connection points is style manager we need a "Pick Point"
    option. It is very cumbersome to measure where each point is, write it
    down, then key it in. More importantly, not every connection point falls
    into autocads 1/256 accuracy. Some connections can't be made exactly where
    they need to be.
    Please use plain text.
    *Andrew

    Re: Connection Points

    11-11-2003 12:21 AM in reply to: *Andrew
    Take 2:
    A simple on/off toggle in the device style under connectors that would link
    connectors together. So when one connector on a device is assigned a
    circuit number, all connectors on that device are assigned that number.


    "Andrew" wrote in message
    news:25D4AEEAA4FDB7954729135CB327183F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > When specifying connection points is style manager we need a "Pick Point"
    > option. It is very cumbersome to measure where each point is, write it
    > down, then key it in. More importantly, not every connection point falls
    > into autocads 1/256 accuracy. Some connections can't be made exactly
    where
    > they need to be.
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *[Autodesk], jason martin

    Re:

    11-11-2003 02:32 AM in reply to: *Andrew
    Hi Andrew -

    I'm a little confused about this. Why do you want multiple connectors it
    they all have the same data? Why not just use a single connector on the
    device?

    jason

    "Andrew" wrote in message
    news:C007444207851BAECB4C5A580D4DEC00@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Take 2:
    > A simple on/off toggle in the device style under connectors that would
    link
    > connectors together. So when one connector on a device is assigned a
    > circuit number, all connectors on that device are assigned that number.
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Andrew

    Re:

    11-11-2003 04:18 AM in reply to: *Andrew
    1. For appearance. Some devices look sloppy when circuiting is all
    connected to a single connection point. Light fixtures for example. If the
    middle of the fixture is the connection point with the "trace geometry"
    cleanup set, wiring can look like a spider web coming out of it from all
    directions. With connection points set to the four quadrants or the mid
    point of each side, the drawing looks much cleaner.

    2. For design. Our surface mount fixtures are according to most standards.
    They are a rectangle with a circle inside. The circle represents where the
    fixtures will be wired together or a j-box. So the circuiting (for us)
    should be shown to the circle. The program doesn't allow to have one
    connection point in the center of the fixture and have "trace geometry"
    clean the wire to the circle. It is only cleaned to the outside of the
    rectangle. With connection points set to the four quadrants of the circle,
    I can accomplish this.


    "jason martin [Autodesk]" wrote in message
    news:37F101E8EF852F69C82F565EB9AA195E@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Hi Andrew -
    >
    > I'm a little confused about this. Why do you want multiple connectors it
    > they all have the same data? Why not just use a single connector on the
    > device?
    >
    > jason
    >
    > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > news:C007444207851BAECB4C5A580D4DEC00@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > Take 2:
    > > A simple on/off toggle in the device style under connectors that would
    > link
    > > connectors together. So when one connector on a device is assigned a
    > > circuit number, all connectors on that device are assigned that number.
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *[Autodesk], jason martin

    Re:

    11-11-2003 04:48 AM in reply to: *Andrew
    Hi Andrew -

    So rather than having additional connectors, what you are looking for is
    better control of the wire snaps and wire cleanup with the devices.

    Allowing you to assign a connector to a piece of geometry within the device
    definition, so that you get a econ snap point anywhere along this geometry
    would help to solve your problem? If this piece of geometry would also scale
    with the device (if it scales), and you could create the geometry "visually"
    rather than specifying "points", it could probably solve a couple other
    problems as well.

    Please understand, I'm not trying to argue with you about this... Just
    trying to determine your needs!

    jason


    "Andrew" wrote in message
    news:3B4EE413AB3A08C74AA8CB6889D74D86@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > 1. For appearance. Some devices look sloppy when circuiting is all
    > connected to a single connection point. Light fixtures for example. If
    the
    > middle of the fixture is the connection point with the "trace geometry"
    > cleanup set, wiring can look like a spider web coming out of it from all
    > directions. With connection points set to the four quadrants or the mid
    > point of each side, the drawing looks much cleaner.
    >
    > 2. For design. Our surface mount fixtures are according to most
    standards.
    > They are a rectangle with a circle inside. The circle represents where
    the
    > fixtures will be wired together or a j-box. So the circuiting (for us)
    > should be shown to the circle. The program doesn't allow to have one
    > connection point in the center of the fixture and have "trace geometry"
    > clean the wire to the circle. It is only cleaned to the outside of the
    > rectangle. With connection points set to the four quadrants of the
    circle,
    > I can accomplish this.
    >
    >
    > "jason martin [Autodesk]" wrote in message
    > news:37F101E8EF852F69C82F565EB9AA195E@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > Hi Andrew -
    > >
    > > I'm a little confused about this. Why do you want multiple connectors it
    > > they all have the same data? Why not just use a single connector on the
    > > device?
    > >
    > > jason
    > >
    > > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > > news:C007444207851BAECB4C5A580D4DEC00@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > Take 2:
    > > > A simple on/off toggle in the device style under connectors that would
    > > link
    > > > connectors together. So when one connector on a device is assigned a
    > > > circuit number, all connectors on that device are assigned that
    number.
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Andrew

    Re:

    11-11-2003 05:39 AM in reply to: *Andrew
    Exactly. This would solve the problem presented in the ABS2004 group with
    multiple branch circuits under the heading "Connectors". Only one connector
    is needed to supply the appropriate data for circuiting the device, but any
    point on that device could be circuited to.


    "jason martin [Autodesk]" wrote in message
    news:6208E504638EFC068EE8844BB13B2ECA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Hi Andrew -
    >
    > So rather than having additional connectors, what you are looking for is
    > better control of the wire snaps and wire cleanup with the devices.
    >
    > Allowing you to assign a connector to a piece of geometry within the
    device
    > definition, so that you get a econ snap point anywhere along this geometry
    > would help to solve your problem? If this piece of geometry would also
    scale
    > with the device (if it scales), and you could create the geometry
    "visually"
    > rather than specifying "points", it could probably solve a couple other
    > problems as well.
    >
    > Please understand, I'm not trying to argue with you about this... Just
    > trying to determine your needs!
    >
    > jason
    >
    >
    > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > news:3B4EE413AB3A08C74AA8CB6889D74D86@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > 1. For appearance. Some devices look sloppy when circuiting is all
    > > connected to a single connection point. Light fixtures for example. If
    > the
    > > middle of the fixture is the connection point with the "trace geometry"
    > > cleanup set, wiring can look like a spider web coming out of it from all
    > > directions. With connection points set to the four quadrants or the mid
    > > point of each side, the drawing looks much cleaner.
    > >
    > > 2. For design. Our surface mount fixtures are according to most
    > standards.
    > > They are a rectangle with a circle inside. The circle represents where
    > the
    > > fixtures will be wired together or a j-box. So the circuiting (for us)
    > > should be shown to the circle. The program doesn't allow to have one
    > > connection point in the center of the fixture and have "trace geometry"
    > > clean the wire to the circle. It is only cleaned to the outside of the
    > > rectangle. With connection points set to the four quadrants of the
    > circle,
    > > I can accomplish this.
    > >
    > >
    > > "jason martin [Autodesk]" wrote in message
    > > news:37F101E8EF852F69C82F565EB9AA195E@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > Hi Andrew -
    > > >
    > > > I'm a little confused about this. Why do you want multiple connectors
    it
    > > > they all have the same data? Why not just use a single connector on
    the
    > > > device?
    > > >
    > > > jason
    > > >
    > > > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > > > news:C007444207851BAECB4C5A580D4DEC00@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > > Take 2:
    > > > > A simple on/off toggle in the device style under connectors that
    would
    > > > link
    > > > > connectors together. So when one connector on a device is assigned
    a
    > > > > circuit number, all connectors on that device are assigned that
    > number.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Snocker, John

    Re:

    11-13-2003 10:13 PM in reply to: *Andrew
    We've done the same thing with our recessed fixtues. The designers want the
    wires shown to the quadrants of the circle in the middle of the device. We
    aren't using the calculation features of BS yet as several of the engineers
    feel they are too old to pickup drafting. :smileytongue: For us if you could have the
    snap point at the center still but allow masking of only the inner circle,
    it'd be acceptable. Thanks!

    -John Snocker


    "Andrew" wrote in message
    news:E1E73A6FD8894E83085B29256F67C755@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Exactly. This would solve the problem presented in the ABS2004 group with
    > multiple branch circuits under the heading "Connectors". Only one
    connector
    > is needed to supply the appropriate data for circuiting the device, but
    any
    > point on that device could be circuited to.
    >
    >
    > "jason martin [Autodesk]" wrote in message
    > news:6208E504638EFC068EE8844BB13B2ECA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > Hi Andrew -
    > >
    > > So rather than having additional connectors, what you are looking for is
    > > better control of the wire snaps and wire cleanup with the devices.
    > >
    > > Allowing you to assign a connector to a piece of geometry within the
    > device
    > > definition, so that you get a econ snap point anywhere along this
    geometry
    > > would help to solve your problem? If this piece of geometry would also
    > scale
    > > with the device (if it scales), and you could create the geometry
    > "visually"
    > > rather than specifying "points", it could probably solve a couple other
    > > problems as well.
    > >
    > > Please understand, I'm not trying to argue with you about this... Just
    > > trying to determine your needs!
    > >
    > > jason
    > >
    > >
    > > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > > news:3B4EE413AB3A08C74AA8CB6889D74D86@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > 1. For appearance. Some devices look sloppy when circuiting is all
    > > > connected to a single connection point. Light fixtures for example.
    If
    > > the
    > > > middle of the fixture is the connection point with the "trace
    geometry"
    > > > cleanup set, wiring can look like a spider web coming out of it from
    all
    > > > directions. With connection points set to the four quadrants or the
    mid
    > > > point of each side, the drawing looks much cleaner.
    > > >
    > > > 2. For design. Our surface mount fixtures are according to most
    > > standards.
    > > > They are a rectangle with a circle inside. The circle represents
    where
    > > the
    > > > fixtures will be wired together or a j-box. So the circuiting (for
    us)
    > > > should be shown to the circle. The program doesn't allow to have one
    > > > connection point in the center of the fixture and have "trace
    geometry"
    > > > clean the wire to the circle. It is only cleaned to the outside of
    the
    > > > rectangle. With connection points set to the four quadrants of the
    > > circle,
    > > > I can accomplish this.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > "jason martin [Autodesk]" wrote in message
    > > > news:37F101E8EF852F69C82F565EB9AA195E@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > > Hi Andrew -
    > > > >
    > > > > I'm a little confused about this. Why do you want multiple
    connectors
    > it
    > > > > they all have the same data? Why not just use a single connector on
    > the
    > > > > device?
    > > > >
    > > > > jason
    > > > >
    > > > > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > > > > news:C007444207851BAECB4C5A580D4DEC00@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > > > Take 2:
    > > > > > A simple on/off toggle in the device style under connectors that
    > would
    > > > > link
    > > > > > connectors together. So when one connector on a device is
    assigned
    > a
    > > > > > circuit number, all connectors on that device are assigned that
    > > number.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Sonnier, Michael

    Re:

    11-13-2003 10:13 PM in reply to: *Andrew
    I do agree with John, that when you do spaghetti line work it would be nice
    to see the line work not break around the outer most line work boundary, but
    at an other per determined line. I also think it would be nice to be able to
    have a pick points rather than the find the distance from the block
    insertion points, "F2" ,copy, paste to notepad then input it into the fields
    manually. I have had to do this as I created additional schematic riser
    diagram symbology and then had to readjusted the insertion scaled size (x12)
    to more closely match the 1/4" scale devices we commonly use on a detail
    sheet since there is only one (1) drawing setup scale allowed per drawing
    (it would be nice if it could be setup per viewport or something). (please
    note that if you do change the scale size readjust the drawing setup units
    for a 1/256" precision otherwise the inaccuracy gets multiplied as well.)

    --
    Michael Sonnier

    "John Snocker" wrote in message
    news:65DD56750531C5D8A2360D1EFC4A5F4E@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > We've done the same thing with our recessed fixtues. The designers want
    the
    > wires shown to the quadrants of the circle in the middle of the device.
    We
    > aren't using the calculation features of BS yet as several of the
    engineers
    > feel they are too old to pickup drafting. :smileytongue: For us if you could have
    the
    > snap point at the center still but allow masking of only the inner circle,
    > it'd be acceptable. Thanks!
    >
    > -John Snocker
    >
    >
    > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > news:E1E73A6FD8894E83085B29256F67C755@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > Exactly. This would solve the problem presented in the ABS2004 group
    with
    > > multiple branch circuits under the heading "Connectors". Only one
    > connector
    > > is needed to supply the appropriate data for circuiting the device, but
    > any
    > > point on that device could be circuited to.
    > >
    > >
    > > "jason martin [Autodesk]" wrote in message
    > > news:6208E504638EFC068EE8844BB13B2ECA@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > Hi Andrew -
    > > >
    > > > So rather than having additional connectors, what you are looking for
    is
    > > > better control of the wire snaps and wire cleanup with the devices.
    > > >
    > > > Allowing you to assign a connector to a piece of geometry within the
    > > device
    > > > definition, so that you get a econ snap point anywhere along this
    > geometry
    > > > would help to solve your problem? If this piece of geometry would also
    > > scale
    > > > with the device (if it scales), and you could create the geometry
    > > "visually"
    > > > rather than specifying "points", it could probably solve a couple
    other
    > > > problems as well.
    > > >
    > > > Please understand, I'm not trying to argue with you about this... Just
    > > > trying to determine your needs!
    > > >
    > > > jason
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > > > news:3B4EE413AB3A08C74AA8CB6889D74D86@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > > 1. For appearance. Some devices look sloppy when circuiting is all
    > > > > connected to a single connection point. Light fixtures for example.
    > If
    > > > the
    > > > > middle of the fixture is the connection point with the "trace
    > geometry"
    > > > > cleanup set, wiring can look like a spider web coming out of it from
    > all
    > > > > directions. With connection points set to the four quadrants or the
    > mid
    > > > > point of each side, the drawing looks much cleaner.
    > > > >
    > > > > 2. For design. Our surface mount fixtures are according to most
    > > > standards.
    > > > > They are a rectangle with a circle inside. The circle represents
    > where
    > > > the
    > > > > fixtures will be wired together or a j-box. So the circuiting (for
    > us)
    > > > > should be shown to the circle. The program doesn't allow to have
    one
    > > > > connection point in the center of the fixture and have "trace
    > geometry"
    > > > > clean the wire to the circle. It is only cleaned to the outside of
    > the
    > > > > rectangle. With connection points set to the four quadrants of the

    > > > circle,
    > > > > I can accomplish this.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > "jason martin [Autodesk]" wrote in
    message
    > > > > news:37F101E8EF852F69C82F565EB9AA195E@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > > > Hi Andrew -
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I'm a little confused about this. Why do you want multiple
    > connectors
    > > it
    > > > > > they all have the same data? Why not just use a single connector
    on
    > > the
    > > > > > device?
    > > > > >
    > > > > > jason
    > > > > >
    > > > > > "Andrew" wrote in message
    > > > > > news:C007444207851BAECB4C5A580D4DEC00@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > > > > Take 2:
    > > > > > > A simple on/off toggle in the device style under connectors that
    > > would
    > > > > > link
    > > > > > > connectors together. So when one connector on a device is
    > assigned
    > > a
    > > > > > > circuit number, all connectors on that device are assigned that
    > > > number.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.