• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • Discussion Groups

    AutoCAD Civil 3D

    Reply
    New Member
    Posts: 2
    Registered: ‎05-07-2010

    Volume report error?

    334 Views, 2 Replies
    08-09-2011 06:14 AM

    Hi everyone, My Name is Marcelo, Im from Argentina.

     

    I have a problem  with cut/fill volume calculations.(between the difference of  the  volume report and the calculation by hand)


    so I  followed the Exercise 3: Generating a Volume Report - earthworks-2.dwg , from the help directory  (civil 3d 2011).

    and I  found differences there too, I think that some volume sections are not right,(ie 6+50, 6+75 to 8+50,etc), or I´m missing something.?


    An station exaple:


    Area st 6+25= 2513.96
    Area st 6+50 = 2560.24

    cut/fill factor =1


    the exaple is using the  Averange end area formula

    Volume = (A1+A2)/2) *L 

    so:

    L= [6+50] - [6+25] =25 foot


    Volume =(2513.96+2560.24)/2 )* 25 = 63427.5 cubic foot

    to cubic yard (as the report)

    Volume * 0.037037037 = 2349.17 cubic yard.

    But the report shown 2479.06 cubic yard


    Same with other stations, and metrics. What Im doing wrong? I missing something?


    I tried this in civil 3d 2011service pack2 on a W7 64bits.


    thanks in advance.

    Marcelo
    

     

    Please use plain text.
    *Expert Elite*
    Posts: 1,257
    Registered: ‎09-05-2006

    Re: Volume report error?

    08-09-2011 06:39 AM in reply to: kx99_2010

    You have used the AVERAGE END METHOD  to calculate your quantity.

     

    Perhaps the computer is using the PRISMOIDAL METHOD.  I believe you have a choice.

     

     

    Bill

     

    Please use plain text.
    New Member
    Posts: 2
    Registered: ‎05-07-2010

    Re: Volume report error?

    08-11-2011 11:30 AM in reply to: wfberry

    Bill,

    Thanks for answering! I really appreciate you taking  time to answer my question.

    I checked that, when I select  the average end area method the calculations are wrong (as I describe above), but  with prismodial method  the calculations are ok.

     

    Thanks

    Marcelo

    Please use plain text.