• Industries
  • Products
  • Buy
  • Services & Support
  • Communities
  • AutoCAD Civil 3D

    Reply
    *Rogerson, Michael

    Spirals >180 Deg Deflection Angle

    122 Views, 6 Replies
    11-06-2003 03:35 AM
    Quick question for those of you who use (or have used) alignment spirals in
    real world applications.

    As you may know, Land Desktop does not allow creation of a spiral with a
    total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees. There is a mathematical
    reason for this.

    Question - Has anyone run into any specific cases where they needed a spiral
    with a total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees? If you have, some
    more detail would be helpful.

    Thank you,
    Mike

    Autodesk, Inc.
    Michael C. Rogerson, PE
    Product Designer - Program Manager
    ISD Civil Engineering Software Development
    Please use plain text.
    *wfb

    Re: Spirals >180 Deg Deflection Angle

    11-06-2003 04:30 AM in reply to: *Rogerson, Michael
    Is this not similar to having a triangle with more than 180 degrees total in
    the 3 interior angles?


    "Michael Rogerson" wrote in message
    news:156AE291D93BBE54FA314ED5E220ED1F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    | Quick question for those of you who use (or have used) alignment spirals
    in
    | real world applications.
    |
    | As you may know, Land Desktop does not allow creation of a spiral with a
    | total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees. There is a mathematical
    | reason for this.
    |
    | Question - Has anyone run into any specific cases where they needed a
    spiral
    | with a total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees? If you have, some
    | more detail would be helpful.
    |
    | Thank you,
    | Mike
    |
    | Autodesk, Inc.
    | Michael C. Rogerson, PE
    | Product Designer - Program Manager
    | ISD Civil Engineering Software Development
    |
    |
    |
    Please use plain text.
    *Comerford, Laurie

    Re:

    11-06-2003 05:21 AM in reply to: *Rogerson, Michael
    Hi Mike,

    Bearing in mind that a driver has to assess the speed at which they can
    drive around a curve and to do this they need to be able to see the curve,
    it would seem fairly frightening to design a spiral through 90 degrees let
    alone 180 degrees.

    --


    Laurie Comerford
    CADApps
    www.cadapps.com.au


    "wfb" wrote in message
    news:3A908D28A84BCD1D7495613993CC077B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Is this not similar to having a triangle with more than 180 degrees total
    in
    > the 3 interior angles?
    >
    >
    > "Michael Rogerson" wrote in
    message
    > news:156AE291D93BBE54FA314ED5E220ED1F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > | Quick question for those of you who use (or have used) alignment spirals
    > in
    > | real world applications.
    > |
    > | As you may know, Land Desktop does not allow creation of a spiral with a
    > | total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees. There is a
    mathematical
    > | reason for this.
    > |
    > | Question - Has anyone run into any specific cases where they needed a
    > spiral
    > | with a total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees? If you have,
    some
    > | more detail would be helpful.
    > |
    > | Thank you,
    > | Mike
    > |
    > | Autodesk, Inc.
    > | Michael C. Rogerson, PE
    > | Product Designer - Program Manager
    > | ISD Civil Engineering Software Development
    > |
    > |
    > |
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Rogerson, Michael

    Re:

    11-06-2003 05:40 AM in reply to: *Rogerson, Michael
    Hi Laurie,
    Agreed, frightening indeed! Not in roads typically but I have in pratice,
    use a spiral lead-off line on a Runway/Taxiway intersection that was indeed
    greater than 90 degrees, but not by much.

    I'm thinking more along the lines of complex interchanges, cloverleaves,
    snaking viaducts and the sort - if anyone has been held back by this
    limitation.

    regards,
    Mike

    "Laurie Comerford" wrote in message
    news:37D85D08B8B752274F024B54817BCACD@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Hi Mike,
    >
    > Bearing in mind that a driver has to assess the speed at which they can
    > drive around a curve and to do this they need to be able to see the curve,
    > it would seem fairly frightening to design a spiral through 90 degrees let
    > alone 180 degrees.
    >
    > --
    >
    >
    > Laurie Comerford
    > CADApps
    > www.cadapps.com.au
    >
    >
    > "wfb" wrote in message
    > news:3A908D28A84BCD1D7495613993CC077B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > Is this not similar to having a triangle with more than 180 degrees
    total
    > in
    > > the 3 interior angles?
    > >
    > >
    > > "Michael Rogerson" wrote in
    > message
    > > news:156AE291D93BBE54FA314ED5E220ED1F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > | Quick question for those of you who use (or have used) alignment
    spirals
    > > in
    > > | real world applications.
    > > |
    > > | As you may know, Land Desktop does not allow creation of a spiral with
    a
    > > | total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees. There is a
    > mathematical
    > > | reason for this.
    > > |
    > > | Question - Has anyone run into any specific cases where they needed a
    > > spiral
    > > | with a total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees? If you have,
    > some
    > > | more detail would be helpful.
    > > |
    > > | Thank you,
    > > | Mike
    > > |
    > > | Autodesk, Inc.
    > > | Michael C. Rogerson, PE
    > > | Product Designer - Program Manager
    > > | ISD Civil Engineering Software Development
    > > |
    > > |
    > > |
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Rizzo, Jon

    Re:

    11-06-2003 05:46 AM in reply to: *Rogerson, Michael
    Couldn't a spiral for, say, a parking garage ramp or on/off ramp be > 180
    degrees? (or the pedestrian ramps at Giants Stadium). I've often heard
    these refered to as "spirals" but most likely because of their 3D shape, not
    because they're spirals mathematically. I can't imagine any other time you
    would use anything more than a very slight spiral. They are, after all,
    just for transitions, and not the curve itself. I've only ever used
    circular curves in roadway design, but that's just me. I have used spirals
    in rail design, but they definately don't come close to 180 degrees.

    Jon Rizzo
    Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.




    "Laurie Comerford" wrote in message
    news:37D85D08B8B752274F024B54817BCACD@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Hi Mike,
    >
    > Bearing in mind that a driver has to assess the speed at which they can
    > drive around a curve and to do this they need to be able to see the curve,
    > it would seem fairly frightening to design a spiral through 90 degrees let
    > alone 180 degrees.
    >
    > --
    >
    >
    > Laurie Comerford
    > CADApps
    > www.cadapps.com.au
    >
    >
    > "wfb" wrote in message
    > news:3A908D28A84BCD1D7495613993CC077B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > Is this not similar to having a triangle with more than 180 degrees
    total
    > in
    > > the 3 interior angles?
    > >
    > >
    > > "Michael Rogerson" wrote in
    > message
    > > news:156AE291D93BBE54FA314ED5E220ED1F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > | Quick question for those of you who use (or have used) alignment
    spirals
    > > in
    > > | real world applications.
    > > |
    > > | As you may know, Land Desktop does not allow creation of a spiral with
    a
    > > | total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees. There is a
    > mathematical
    > > | reason for this.
    > > |
    > > | Question - Has anyone run into any specific cases where they needed a
    > > spiral
    > > | with a total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees? If you have,
    > some
    > > | more detail would be helpful.
    > > |
    > > | Thank you,
    > > | Mike
    > > |
    > > | Autodesk, Inc.
    > > | Michael C. Rogerson, PE
    > > | Product Designer - Program Manager
    > > | ISD Civil Engineering Software Development
    > > |
    > > |
    > > |
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Comerford, Laurie

    Re:

    11-06-2003 06:01 AM in reply to: *Rogerson, Michael
    Hi Mike,

    My experience of airports is confined to inside an aluminium tube.

    However, for intersections such as you describe, I can't see any difference
    in principle. A constantly changing radius on a clover leaf where you
    inevitably have grade changes as well seems just as frightening.

    Lastly, as wfb indicated assuming a symmetrical curve, it you have an entry
    spiral > 180 degrees, add an exit spiral > 180 degrees and you have gone
    through > 360 degrees. I don't think I'd approve that sort of layout. Even
    with a circular curve, you would have to wonder if there is a better
    solution to the intersection layout.

    --


    Laurie Comerford
    CADApps
    www.cadapps.com.au


    "Michael Rogerson" wrote in message
    news:smileyvery-happy:6F1B79B06B9F5AB0FC95C4AF0C70053@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Hi Laurie,
    > Agreed, frightening indeed! Not in roads typically but I have in pratice,
    > use a spiral lead-off line on a Runway/Taxiway intersection that was
    indeed
    > greater than 90 degrees, but not by much.
    >
    > I'm thinking more along the lines of complex interchanges, cloverleaves,
    > snaking viaducts and the sort - if anyone has been held back by this
    > limitation.
    >
    > regards,
    > Mike
    >
    > "Laurie Comerford" wrote in message
    > news:37D85D08B8B752274F024B54817BCACD@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > Hi Mike,
    > >
    > > Bearing in mind that a driver has to assess the speed at which they can
    > > drive around a curve and to do this they need to be able to see the
    curve,
    > > it would seem fairly frightening to design a spiral through 90 degrees
    let
    > > alone 180 degrees.
    > >
    > > --
    > >
    > >
    > > Laurie Comerford
    > > CADApps
    > > www.cadapps.com.au
    > >
    > >
    > > "wfb" wrote in message
    > > news:3A908D28A84BCD1D7495613993CC077B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > Is this not similar to having a triangle with more than 180 degrees
    > total
    > > in
    > > > the 3 interior angles?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > "Michael Rogerson" wrote in
    > > message
    > > > news:156AE291D93BBE54FA314ED5E220ED1F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > | Quick question for those of you who use (or have used) alignment
    > spirals
    > > > in
    > > > | real world applications.
    > > > |
    > > > | As you may know, Land Desktop does not allow creation of a spiral
    with
    > a
    > > > | total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees. There is a
    > > mathematical
    > > > | reason for this.
    > > > |
    > > > | Question - Has anyone run into any specific cases where they needed
    a
    > > > spiral
    > > > | with a total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees? If you
    have,
    > > some
    > > > | more detail would be helpful.
    > > > |
    > > > | Thank you,
    > > > | Mike
    > > > |
    > > > | Autodesk, Inc.
    > > > | Michael C. Rogerson, PE
    > > > | Product Designer - Program Manager
    > > > | ISD Civil Engineering Software Development
    > > > |
    > > > |
    > > > |
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.
    *Rogerson, Michael

    Re:

    11-06-2003 11:23 PM in reply to: *Rogerson, Michael
    For the "spiral" ramp - I think, as you say, more of a "Helix" rather than
    any type of 2D spiral. Would make an interesting 2D alignment indeed.

    I'm certainly not expecting that anyone needs a spiral greater than 180
    degrees, nor I have not ever heard of a request for one, but if there is
    anyone out there that can't get something accomplished because of this, I'm
    like to hear.

    Mike


    "Jon Rizzo" wrote in message
    news:077BACE3E38C2B97B20238C5DED07020@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > Couldn't a spiral for, say, a parking garage ramp or on/off ramp be > 180
    > degrees? (or the pedestrian ramps at Giants Stadium). I've often heard
    > these refered to as "spirals" but most likely because of their 3D shape,
    not
    > because they're spirals mathematically. I can't imagine any other time
    you
    > would use anything more than a very slight spiral. They are, after all,
    > just for transitions, and not the curve itself. I've only ever used
    > circular curves in roadway design, but that's just me. I have used
    spirals
    > in rail design, but they definately don't come close to 180 degrees.
    >
    > Jon Rizzo
    > Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "Laurie Comerford" wrote in message
    > news:37D85D08B8B752274F024B54817BCACD@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > Hi Mike,
    > >
    > > Bearing in mind that a driver has to assess the speed at which they can
    > > drive around a curve and to do this they need to be able to see the
    curve,
    > > it would seem fairly frightening to design a spiral through 90 degrees
    let
    > > alone 180 degrees.
    > >
    > > --
    > >
    > >
    > > Laurie Comerford
    > > CADApps
    > > www.cadapps.com.au
    > >
    > >
    > > "wfb" wrote in message
    > > news:3A908D28A84BCD1D7495613993CC077B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > Is this not similar to having a triangle with more than 180 degrees
    > total
    > > in
    > > > the 3 interior angles?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > "Michael Rogerson" wrote in
    > > message
    > > > news:156AE291D93BBE54FA314ED5E220ED1F@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
    > > > | Quick question for those of you who use (or have used) alignment
    > spirals
    > > > in
    > > > | real world applications.
    > > > |
    > > > | As you may know, Land Desktop does not allow creation of a spiral
    with
    > a
    > > > | total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees. There is a
    > > mathematical
    > > > | reason for this.
    > > > |
    > > > | Question - Has anyone run into any specific cases where they needed
    a
    > > > spiral
    > > > | with a total deflection angle greater than 180 degrees? If you
    have,
    > > some
    > > > | more detail would be helpful.
    > > > |
    > > > | Thank you,
    > > > | Mike
    > > > |
    > > > | Autodesk, Inc.
    > > > | Michael C. Rogerson, PE
    > > > | Product Designer - Program Manager
    > > > | ISD Civil Engineering Software Development
    > > > |
    > > > |
    > > > |
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    Please use plain text.