AutoCAD Civil 3D
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Re: Possible to create a surface that uses the highest elevation of two surfaces
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Glad to see so many people thinking about my question. The reason I asked was because I was hoping for an easy way to determine the tidal prism for a marsh. In this case the tidal prism is the volume between the MLLW and the MHHW.
I have the surface for the marsh topography. I was going to create two more surfaces as planes, one for the MLLW elevation and the other for the MHHW elevation.
I wanted to "clip" the marsh topo with each of these surfaces to create two new surfaces. One representing the site at low tide, the other at high tide. From there I would do a comparison surface to get the volume difference.
I just couldn't figure out how to do the "clip" surfaces easily. Yesterday I wasn't thinking of it in terms of clipping, but now that I am perhaps someone will come up with a really easy way to do what I am asking.
In the end I ended up creating two volume surfaces, one for the volume between the MLLW and the topo and another for the MHHW and the topo. I then took the difference of the two fill values to get the tidal prism.
Erik
Re: Possible to create a surface that uses the highest elevation of two surfaces
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
From each of your plane surfaces, turn the border display on, then extract the border from the surface. You can then use this to clip a copy of the marsh surface to create your two surfaces for volume calculation.
Andrew Puller
Maitland, NSW, Australia
Windows 7 Enterprise 64bit
Intel core i7 2600 @ 3.40 GHz with 16GB Ram
Civil 3d 2013 64bit
Re: Possible to create a surface that uses the highest elevation of two surfaces
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Easier solution then.
a) use bounded volumes
b) make a flat boxed feature line bigger than (or = to) your area of interest with elevation=LW, then HW, creating a flat surface by adding the feature line as a beakline to an empty surface.
Compute a volume between your marsh surface and your LW, and then again your HW. Ignore the cut volumes, using only the fill (vol between lower marsh surface and higher LW/HW surface). The cut volume is where the marsh is above your water levels and should be insignificant. Break out a calculator and take the difference.
Win 7 Pro SP1 64 bit
Intel i7 3770 @ 3.40 GHz
16 GB RAM
Civil 3D 2014 (IDSP)


