AutoCAD Civil 3D
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
*Thomas Glidewell
Parcel labels
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
47 Views, 5 Replies
04-06-2004 06:50 AM
I started creating and labeling my parcels and have noticed that when you
label the parcels it places a label for each section of line in the parcel.
Example you have a lot that goes north to south and another lot intersecting
that lot line let's say the middel of it going east to west, it places a
label for each individual section of that lot line going north to south. Is
there a way to make it label the entire length rather than breaking it into
two labels. I have tried bpolying the lot and getting rid of the vertx at
the intersection but it still labels each section of line, also have tried
using the add label rather than letting it do it automaticaly with no luck.
The reasoning is we label each lot as if it was a individual total of the
each line inside the parcel rather the breaking up of the parcel line,
except when the bearing changes than we would use two labels. Same bearing
for the lot line one label. Hope I didn't rambel to much.
Thanks for the help.
Tom G.
*Brian Hailey
Re: Parcel labels
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-06-2004 07:27 AM in reply to:
*Thomas Glidewell
Thomas,
Try creating the parcel in a new site. Parcels in different sites don't
interact the way you are experiencing (I think).
Brian
*James Wedding
Re: Parcel labels
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-06-2004 07:57 AM in reply to:
*Thomas Glidewell
You'll have to label the site (The outer boundary) and then the individual
parcels.
--
James Wedding, P.E.
IT Manager
Jones & Boyd, Inc.
Dallas, TX
XP/1 on P4-1.6/512
LDT2004+C3D
*Thomas Glidewell
Re: Parcel labels
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-06-2004 08:07 AM in reply to:
*Thomas Glidewell
Yeah I have found out about the boundary label I did create a different site
for my boundary and it holds its labels. It is the individual lots inside
the boundary that I am refering to. We are doing a sub-division with several
hundred family lots inside the boundary and each one of those are the ones I
am having trouble with and I can't see making a different site for each one
of those.
Thanks
"James Wedding" wrote in message
news:4072c574$1_2@newsprd01...
> You'll have to label the site (The outer boundary) and then the individual
> parcels.
>
> --
> James Wedding, P.E.
> IT Manager
> Jones & Boyd, Inc.
> Dallas, TX
> XP/1 on P4-1.6/512
> LDT2004+C3D
>
>
*Laurie Comerford
Re: Parcel labels
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-06-2004 12:47 PM in reply to:
*Thomas Glidewell
Hi Thomas,
The news is bad. The labelling applies to the drafting and the drafting
includes to the short lines.
The only solution is to draw the extra lines and label them. You will have
to use different label styles to deal with the fact that many of the lots
sides are broken in the adjacent lots.
In new jobs you should do the drafting first and define the lots so that
they don't have to broken sides.
--
Laurie Comerford
CADApps
www.cadapps.com.au
.
"Thomas Glidewell" wrote in message
news:4072c75b$1_2@newsprd01...
> Yeah I have found out about the boundary label I did create a different
site
> for my boundary and it holds its labels. It is the individual lots inside
> the boundary that I am refering to. We are doing a sub-division with
several
> hundred family lots inside the boundary and each one of those are the ones
I
> am having trouble with and I can't see making a different site for each
one
> of those.
> Thanks
> "James Wedding" wrote in message
> news:4072c574$1_2@newsprd01...
> > You'll have to label the site (The outer boundary) and then the
individual
> > parcels.
> >
> > --
> > James Wedding, P.E.
> > IT Manager
> > Jones & Boyd, Inc.
> > Dallas, TX
> > XP/1 on P4-1.6/512
> > LDT2004+C3D
> >
> >
>
>
*Laurie Comerford
Re: Parcel labels
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-06-2004 12:49 PM in reply to:
*Thomas Glidewell
Hi,
Please disregard this. I was thinking Land Desktop.
--
Laurie Comerford
CADApps
www.cadapps.com.au
"Laurie Comerford" wrote in message
news:40730816_3@newsprd01...
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The news is bad. The labelling applies to the drafting and the drafting
> includes to the short lines.
>
> The only solution is to draw the extra lines and label them. You will
have
> to use different label styles to deal with the fact that many of the lots
> sides are broken in the adjacent lots.
>
> In new jobs you should do the drafting first and define the lots so that
> they don't have to broken sides.
>
> --
>
>
> Laurie Comerford
> CADApps
> www.cadapps.com.au
> .
>
> "Thomas Glidewell" wrote in message
> news:4072c75b$1_2@newsprd01...
> > Yeah I have found out about the boundary label I did create a different
> site
> > for my boundary and it holds its labels. It is the individual lots
inside
> > the boundary that I am refering to. We are doing a sub-division with
> several
> > hundred family lots inside the boundary and each one of those are the
ones
> I
> > am having trouble with and I can't see making a different site for each
> one
> > of those.
> > Thanks
> > "James Wedding" wrote in message
> > news:4072c574$1_2@newsprd01...
> > > You'll have to label the site (The outer boundary) and then the
> individual
> > > parcels.
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Wedding, P.E.
> > > IT Manager
> > > Jones & Boyd, Inc.
> > > Dallas, TX
> > > XP/1 on P4-1.6/512
> > > LDT2004+C3D
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
