AutoCAD Civil 3D - Stormwater

Reply
Contributor
Ehrhart4
Posts: 11
Registered: ‎12-27-2011
Message 1 of 3 (118 Views)

Hydroflow diversion- Oscillation- negative hydrograph volumes & descending limb

118 Views, 2 Replies
12-27-2012 08:34 AM

I used a diversion from a basin to direct the spillway to a swale that feeds a second basin.  I’m getting oscillation in the resulting hydrographs (32-33) and a negative volume under the hydrograph and negative flows on the descending limb that carries through to the subsequent hydrographs.  I decreased my time interval to 1 minute.  No change.  The split as far as rate looks good.  I’m thinking because the diversion has no area it doesn’t generate a volume for the hydrograph (…worse it generates a negative volume).  However when it gets to the second basin the peak inflow reported is correct and the basin routing also looks accurate.

 

Is there anything I can do to get rid of the oscillation?  Is it a problem?

 

Also the diversion hydrograph reports the same peak rate, etc. until you make a report…then it correctly assigns the peaks.  Is this normal?

Employee
Matt.Anderson
Posts: 2,909
Registered: ‎05-13-2005
Message 2 of 3 (105 Views)

Re: Hydroflow diversion- Oscillation- negative hydrograph volumes & descendi

01-03-2013 06:26 AM in reply to: Ehrhart4

Can you zip and attached your model?

Matthew Anderson, PE
Product Manager
Contributor
Ehrhart4
Posts: 11
Registered: ‎12-27-2011
Message 3 of 3 (100 Views)

Re: Hydroflow diversion- Oscillation- negative hydrograph volumes & descendi

01-03-2013 07:46 AM in reply to: Ehrhart4

Matt,

Update.  I asked a local user of Hydroflow.  The oscillation occurs when I divert the primary discharge pipe (which in reality is the discharge that is being pealed off to a combined system).  He recommended me switching the diversion to identify the emergency spillway (Weir B) and then do the combination of the appropriate leg of the diversion with the subsequent hydrographs (through a connecting swale and to a second basin).   I attached both the original and the revised so you can see the difference.  It appears that the pipe/orifice calculations combined with the diversion is unstable.  See if I went wrong elsewhere.

 

Thanks!!!

Carrol

You are not logged in.

Log into access your profile, ask and answer questions, share ideas and more. Haven't signed up yet? Register

Announcements
Are you familiar with the Autodesk Expert Elites? The Expert Elite program is made up of customers that help other customers by sharing knowledge and exemplifying an engaging style of collaboration. To learn more, please visit our Expert Elite website.

Need installation help?

Start with some of our most frequented solutions to get help installing your software.

Ask the Community


Civil 3D Exchange Apps

Created by the community for the community, Autodesk Exchange Apps for AutoCAD Civil 3D helps you achieve greater speed, accuracy, and automation from concept to manufacturing.

Connect with Civil 3D

Twitter

Facebook

Blogs