lane slope report

[tonypalacio]

<->The result of lane slope report is zero in slope left and right...the superelevation view is ok and also the sections can anybody tell me what I am doing wrong?

[wfberry]

Please Note:

Include pertinent information.  

No one know what version of Civil 3D you have, include SPs.  OS also, Computer specs.

Bill

[tonypalacio]

Thanks for replying.... I will post all that information

[tonypalacio]

Lane slope report is zero in left and right slope.... sections view and superelevation view are ok. can anybody tell me what I am doing wrong?

I have Civil 3d 2014.

Windows 7 Professional

Processor: Intel (R) CPU  ES-1603 @ 2.8 Hz

8.0 Gb Ram

[Jeff_M]

Can you post your drawing?

[tonypalacio]

SL Name Station Existing Ground Elevation Layout Profile Elevation X Y Slope Left Slope Right

0+000.00 0+000.00 498.976 498.308 1,156,814.721 1,279,669.135 0.00 0.00

0+010.00 0+010.00 498.395 498.103 1,156,811.549 1,279,678.619 0.00 0.00

0+011.55 0+011.55 498.176 498.072 1,156,811.057 1,279,680.091 0.00 0.00

0+012.00 0+012.00 498.102 498.062 1,156,810.910 1,279,680.514 0.00 0.00

0+014.00 0+014.00 498.223 498.021 1,156,810.142 1,279,682.359 0.00 0.00

0+016.00 0+016.00 498.203 497.981 1,156,809.194 1,279,684.120 0.00 0.00

0+018.91 0+018.91 497.817 497.921 1,156,807.517 1,279,686.493 0.00 0.00

0+020.00 0+020.00 497.913 497.899 1,156,806.802 1,279,687.317 0.00 0.00

0+025.00 0+025.00 497.635 497.796 1,156,803.005 1,279,690.551 0.00 0.00

0+026.27 0+026.27 497.422 497.770 1,156,801.926 1,279,691.212 0.00 0.00

0+027.00 0+027.00 497.419 497.755 1,156,801.288 1,279,691.576 0.00 0.00

0+029.00 0+029.00 497.409 497.714 1,156,799.552 1,279,692.568 0.00 0.00

0+030.00 0+030.00 497.404 497.694 1,156,798.683 1,279,693.063 0.00 0.00

[Jeff_M · Accepted solution]

Evidently the Report doesn't like the LaneOutsideSuperMultiLayer subassembly. If I replce this sub with the LaneSuperelevationAOR subassembly, then the report gives the correct lane slopes.

[tonypalacio]

I tried subassembly LaneSuperelevationAOR and gives me a good report exept that opposite sign

SL Name Station Existing Ground Elevation Layout Profile Elevation X Y Slope Left Slope Right

0+000.00 0+000.00 498.976 498.308 1,156,814.721 1,279,669.135 2.0% 2.0%

0+010.00 0+010.00 498.395 498.103 1,156,811.549 1,279,678.619 2.0% 2.0%

0+011.55 0+011.55 498.176 498.072 1,156,811.057 1,279,680.091 2.0% 0.4%

0+012.00 0+012.00 498.102 498.062 1,156,810.910 1,279,680.514 2.0% 0.0%

0+014.00 0+014.00 498.223 498.021 1,156,810.142 1,279,682.359 2.0% -2.0%

0+016.00 0+016.00 498.203 497.981 1,156,809.194 1,279,684.120 8.0% -8.0%

0+018.91 0+018.91 497.817 497.921 1,156,807.517 1,279,686.493 8.0% -8.0%

0+020.00 0+020.00 497.913 497.899 1,156,806.802 1,279,687.317 8.0% -8.0%

0+025.00 0+025.00 497.635 497.796 1,156,803.005 1,279,690.551 8.0% -8.0%

0+026.27 0+026.27 497.422 497.770 1,156,801.926 1,279,691.212 4.2% -4.2%

0+027.00 0+027.00 497.419 497.755 1,156,801.288 1,279,691.576 2.0% -2.0%

[Jeff_M]

To follow up on my last post with Why the report won't work with that subassembly. The Report is hard-coded to use the ETW point code to determine the widthe of the lane. On the subassembly used, the ETW (P1) is also the Crown point, whereas the outside of the lane (P2) uses the "Lane" code. The sub I tested with has P2 coded as ETW, thereby allowing it to work. This is just another defect in the Reports/Subassemblies that needs to be corrected.

If you know how to edit VB.NET code and rebuild the dll, this can be fairly easily addressed for your own use.

[tonypalacio]

Thank you for your valued cooperation. It was very useful

[denes.nagy]

Dear Jeff_M,

I have the same problem in C3D 2022 like tonypalacio, but your solution doesn't work in my case. I tried to use the above mentioned subassembly and I tried also a generic subassembly using "Crown" and "ETW" codes.

Otherwise which file should I open in VB editor to see what point codes the report uses to determine the lane slope?

[sg1102015]

What is the alternative for lane slope report ?