Hey Doctor Wedding;
I'm not sure if you've noticed, but the company mantra has become "Less, not
More" at least for NGs.
Both Anne and Peter basically said the same thing if you'll notice.
I'm with you, though. The more options the better.
Some of us think that the tree should have few branches; some of us think
that the tree should have many branches.
I think the tree trimming service in charge of the NGs has decided that it
needs few.
--
Don Reichle
Hacker Engineering, Inc.
"King of Work-Arounds"
LDT & CD 2004
C3D 2004 SP1
On HP Pavilion a367c
2.80 Ghz/512MB RAM
XP PRO - SP2
"James Wedding" wrote in message
news:4190d82c_1@newsprd01...
> Why? We have an Acad Customization Group, and a Land customization, why
> not a C3D one? I realize there's a proponderence of groups, but they're
> all for completely distinct products.
>
> Thanks to the ineptness of the product naming team Civil3D (C3D) and Civil
> Design (CD) are already confused by half the people posting here. Please
> don't further confuse the issue by putting C3D in with LDT in
> customization groups, it'll just frustrate the hell out of most of us.
>
> C3D needs its own tree of groups: customization, wishlist, and main, and
> maybe a content one for people that will share things like styles and
> assemblies.
>
> --
> James Wedding, P.E.
> IT Manager
> Jones & Boyd, Inc.
> Dallas, TX
> XP/2 on P4-3.4/1G
> LDT2005+C3D
> http://au.autodesk.com
> Sign up now for AU2004!
>