Community
Civil 3D Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Civil 3D Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular AutoCAD Civil 3D topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Grid to Ground Coordinates

27 REPLIES 27
Reply
Message 1 of 28
jgemperline
4562 Views, 27 Replies

Grid to Ground Coordinates

Hey All,

I have been asked to convert my design in Civil 3D from Grid (Wyoming East Zone, U.S. Survey Feet) into Ground Coordinates (combined Scale Factor =0.99971591, Grid to Ground = 1.000284171). Can this be done in the Transformation Tab?

Thanks
Joe
27 REPLIES 27
Message 21 of 28
GeoTechnical
in reply to: jgemperline

Why would you ever think that you need to design at State Plane Grid? All Surveying will be done on the ground and the difference in length is approximatly a tenth of a foot for every thousand feet in elevation.
GeoTechnical
Land Surveyor
Gillette WY
Message 22 of 28
Sinc
in reply to: jgemperline

There are good reasons for designing on State Plane, and it fixes many problems, at the cost of potentially creating the grid-to-ground problem.

But again, I would ask that we not start discussing this topic in this thread, as it is irrelevant to the OP's question, and it is impolite to co-opt a thread.

-- Sinc
http://www.ejsurveying.com
http://www.quuxsoft.com
Sinc
Message 23 of 28
jgemperline
in reply to: jgemperline

GeoTechnical,

Good Name by the way. I would love to here all about both sides, but I do agree with Sinc. It would help the flow of the Forum (searching ex.) if we started a new Post. Please do. I would but have little knowledge of both topics, hence my original question. I do think Autodesk Forum is a good place for this discussion too. I will subscribe to your Post!

Thanks
Joe
Message 24 of 28
MJP42
in reply to: jgemperline

Discuss this with the surveyor. He likely set his primary control using GPS. Most of the time (but not always) GPS units will report grid coordinates. If you scale the coordinates up to surface, you are best to use a point that is fixed on the ground (ie. primary survey control point) and close to the center of the project, so the grid and surface coordinates are the same for that point. With a small site, the surveyor can stakeout the project using either grid or ground coordinates and be OK, assuming it is typical development stuff, ie roads, sewers, drainage, etc. If you scale based on 0,0, you will shift the entire site a significant amount...usually 2 or 3 feet. This can cause havoc when re-establishing survey control and staking out the project.
Message 25 of 28
Anonymous
in reply to: jgemperline

According to my calculations of the OP's scale factor and project size there
would be approximately 1.5 feet of difference when comparing grid to ground
distances. I would hardly classify that as close enough for typical
development staking.

Personally I would never supply our design staff with grid coordinates to
design from. Typically we supply ground distances with a CSF. All work is
designed and completed at ground yet the have the CSF if they need to import
georefenced files of any sort like images or GIS data.



wrote in message news:6391804@discussion.autodesk.com...
Discuss this with the surveyor. He likely set his primary control using
GPS. Most of the time (but not always) GPS units will report grid
coordinates. If you scale the coordinates up to surface, you are best to
use a point that is fixed on the ground (ie. primary survey control point)
and close to the center of the project, so the grid and surface coordinates
are the same for that point. With a small site, the surveyor can stakeout
the project using either grid or ground coordinates and be OK, assuming it
is typical development stuff, ie roads, sewers, drainage, etc. If you scale
based on 0,0, you will shift the entire site a significant amount...usually
2 or 3 feet. This can cause havoc when re-establishing survey control and
staking out the project.
Message 26 of 28
MJP42
in reply to: jgemperline

Mike, you are right. That is significant even on typical development staking. I work in an area at much lower elevations so we dont see nearly that much difference between grid and surface and its not really a big deal unless you have a 10 mile road job. Sorry for my closed-mindedness. I dont know that I can suggest anything except get with the surveyor and figure out how to satisfy the plan reviewer cause it is a big deal.
Message 27 of 28
stacy.dunn
in reply to: jgemperline

MJP42,
Where are you located that your coordinates only move a few feet when applying a ground scale factor? In my part of Texas, a shift of 1200-1500 feet is the norm if applied at 0,0.



For the original post, be aware that if you scale objects using autocad, the z value is affected also.
Stacy Dunn
Message 28 of 28
amdomag
in reply to: jgemperline

Transforming Grid to local system does only involve one Convergence and Scale Factors values. In fact, there are practically infinite number of convergence and scale factor values involved. One must have working knowledge in geodesy.

Construction people can not just impose their coordinate system. They must undergo training on how coordinate systems relate.

Arnel M. Domag
nth geographics and geometrics

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Rail Community


Autodesk Design & Make Report