Dats da one.
Maybe I'm reading too much between the lines but I steer clear.
In my earlier experience I used a BasiCurb and because it has no offset on the face I believe it caused corruption in my TIN, at the time.
I too stear clear of the basic subassemblies. Why? Well, I remember them causing issues several releases ago. What where those issues? I honestly don't remember.
If the only reason you are doing something is because that's the way you've always done it, you're doing it wrong.
Perhaps I should go revisit the basic subs and see if they still cause issues or not.
Instead of a Basic Lane, use a UrbanSidewalk with a 0' inside width, 2' walk, 0' outside width. Attach the ret.wall to this, the sidewalk width can be set to a target.
Yep that worked Jeff. The only thing I ran into was, I put the "shape trapezoidal" sub-assembly under the sidewalk and in my section where the urban sidewalk was gone because the wall took its place, the shape trapezoidal sub-assembly moved up in the place of the sidewalk. I didn't get this at first but when I targeted that sub-assembly to the same target lines as my sidewalk was targeted to, the shape trapeaoidal sub-assmbly went away also. Make sense? Kinda wordy but I think it doing what I need it to.
Your absolutley right Fred; they would never put anything in the program that would screw things up
Log into access your profile, ask and answer questions, share ideas and more. Haven't signed up yet? Register