There's a few problems with the MTO styles kit...
This all sounds quite negative but i dont' intend it to be nor am i trying to promote Inroads. I was actually in search of an MTO C3D 2009.dwt when i came across this thread so i thought i would point out some facts.
Also, for those wondering about the mtoeng.shx, this font is the same as romans. It was initially created to input symbols in text before autocad had that capability. Nowadays, it causes more grief than anything and we tend to use romans with no complaints from the MTO.
For those who work and live outside the center of the universe of Ontario, up north in Canada. The focus is on access the TAC design standards, not neccessarily the Ontario MTO requirements and needs.
My question is why can't Autodesk release the standard version of Civil 3D with the TAC (Canadian) standards available similar to AASHTO? We are now onto Civil 3D 2011 and 2012, why can't there be a dropdown with TAC standards available. Have the user specify this at the time of installation.
Especially since we've identified all the work was done in 2010 and issued as the "Ontario support pack"?
All I know is that BC and SK are both looking for valid options for Civil 3D that meets their design criteria. Having TAC readily available would help. Maybe Autodesk could put one of their guys on this for a couple weeks and get the Canadian Standards in place for future C3D releases?
I have just posted the TAC 1999 Tables that were requested in another link. It was provided to Autodesk January 16, 2013. A designer has verified they work as per TAC standards. Attached are the updated tables.
--Jeff